Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, December 26, 2007 2:10:54 PM
"
It was five years before the turn of the century and
major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York
Times was headlined with the serious concerns of “geologists.” Only the
president at the time wasn’t Bill Clinton; it was Grover Cleveland. And the
Times wasn’t warning about global warming -- it was telling readers the looming
dangers of a new ice age. The year was 1895, and it was just one of four
different time periods in the last 100 years when major print media
predicted an impending climate crisis. Each prediction carried its own elements
of doom, saying Canada could be “wiped out” or lower crop yields would mean
“billions will die.” [Emphasis mine. -RT] I love liberals! Because their tired,
old "theories" are so easy to disprove. Such as the one where they
insist that "there are no absolutes" by making an absolute statement.
Global warming is the same. All you have to do is look at history to see
how stupid are their "theories." Climate change is a "natural
phenomena" and is "cyclical." It has been since the world began,
without destroying, or even hurting the world in general. AlGore won't even
debate global warming on its merits any more. If an eminent weather scientist
disagrees with his ignorant claims, he simply says that scientist "is no
longer in the 'mainstream' of science" and refuses to debate it other than
that. He is now claiming that all those who disagree with him are
simply "global warming deniers," as if that discredited them (he wishes). He says
global warming is "settled science," and bases that on what he calls
a "scientific consensus." I've got news for you, Al. "Consensus"
is not science. Science is or is not. No amount of
"voting" by one scientist against another is going to change science.
He calls such people "flat-earthers." But that's what I call the
"snake-oil salesman" who are pushing Al's con and making millions on
it by planting trees on your money. (BMI)