Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 1:34:44 PM
”Do you remember a few short weeks ago when Hillary
suggested that the real mover and shaker on civil rights was not MLK but LBJ,
without whom MLK's efforts would have been for naught, essentially? Do you
remember the Clintons' surrogate, Robert Johnson, smearing Barack Obama with
allusions to his youthful drug experimentation? Liberals, including the
mainstream dinosaur media, circled the wagons around her, insisting she
couldn't possibly have intended racial slurs. Even many conservatives hastened
to defend her against this charge. Had a Republican made a statement like
Hillary's about the respective accomplishments of MLK (an African American) and
LBJ on the heels of making a similar comparison between Obama (an African
American) and herself, liberals would have savaged him and driven him out of
the race. They would have invoked the irrebuttable liberal presumption that
conservatives are racists. Just ask Trent Lott. With Democrats, the opposite presumption applies. Hillary couldn't
possibly have intended a racial slur, nor could she have been guilty of
racial insensitivity, because she is a liberal Democrat and liberal
Democrats are enlightened and incapable of racism. You need look no
further than the race-based assaults by liberal cartoonists against
Condoleezza Rice to understand the magnitude of this double standard.
" According to Democrats
(liberal socialists), only conservatives and Republicans CAN be racist. To
think it of a Democrat, to them, is silly and stupid. They really think most of
American believes that. And they're right, to a degree. Those who "pay no
attention to politics" until just before an election usually do. Those of
us who pay attention all the time, don't . (David Limbaugh)