Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:09:24 PM
That's what he was having with a female lobbyist
during his last campaign, according to unnamed, anonymous
"sources" who didn't have the guts to come forward with their names,
yet the New York Times didn't care. They ran with it, even though they
had nothing in the way of proof that there was ever such an affair.
McCain says it's bulls--t. Their "unnamed anonymous sources" might
have been Hillary Clinton's campaign workers, for all we know, and for all NYT
knows. But of course, since McCain seems to be the Republican candidate for
president, they decided to unload on him now, true or not. What amazes me about
McCain is his insistence on calling people like those at NYT who ran this story
his "friends." That story wasn't run by "his friends." Now,
I'm not "big" on McCain, either. But since he's all we seem to have
this time to run against Hillary and Obama's socialist machine, I'll probably
have to vote for him to keep Hillary and Obama out of the White House.
Hillary because they still seem to think she is "anointed" to be
president, and Obama because he's even more of a socialist liberal than she is.
(New York Times)