About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Newt's "Worn Out His Welcome"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 4:11:15 PM
When I see Newt Gingrich sitting on a couch next to  Nancy Pelosi pushing global warming, he has "worn out his welcome" with me because he has shown his complete IGNORANCE on "global warming" and I don't want his to be elected or appointed to ANY office that might affect me in the future. When I see this image it tells me not that "they" have agreed on something, but that HE has "agreed with HER!" ANY time I see a Republican sitting on the same couch with such as Pelosi, he loses ALL his credibility with me. I have unsubscribed from his e-mail newsletter and will from now on ignore anything he says, as I do with Democrats (except to learn of their latest idiocy).(Adam Naranjo)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Biggest, Most Successful Swindle Yet

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:52:40 PM
AlGore was a "rich man" when he was vice-president. But not nearly as rich as he is now, after years of "working" the "global warming swindle." Now he wants to subject this country to what will be a TRILLION DOLLAR TAX to "help alleviate" global warming, which is only in his warped mind. He has already benefited from this scam to the tune of millions of dollars, and what is this "major catastrophe" to which he refers? A 1/4 degree temperature rise in A HUNDRED YEARS! Something that has been happening periodically since the dawn of time without ANY danger to humans, and NOT caused by humans. Even that highly vaunted picture of ice "breaking off" and sliding into the sea he uses to convince us is a MINIATURE, and the "ice" is plastic foam. Yes, ice DOES periodically break off and slide into the sea. It also reforms elsewhere. Polar bears DO have to swim now and then, but then they can swim for HUNDREDS OF MILES. They LIVE in "cold country" and have no trouble if it's a fraction of a degree warmer for a while. Gore has used his status asa a former vice-president to push the most massive swindle in the history of America (that we know about) and to enrich himself (beyond how rich he was already) in the process. He needs to be "reined in." His propaganda movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," is "required viewing" in many schools around the world. But according to a British court, contains at least ELEVEN lies (that they call "inaccuracies") and the film can't be shown to schoolchildren in that country without attention being called to those lies. Fred Singer, one of the world's top environmental scientists, the man who INVENTED the very instruments used to determine "global warming" or "global cooling," says this: "Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth has met its match: a devastating documentary recently shown on British television, which has now been viewed by millions of people on the Internet. Despite its flamboyant title, The Great Global Warming Swindle is based on sound science and interviews with real climate scientists, including me. An Inconvenient Truth, on the other hand, is mostly an emotional presentation from a single politician." This is the kind of person Al calls a "denier," as if his word is not worth anything, his knowledge and experience notwithstanding.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attack! Attack!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:44:57 PM
Hillary once called The American Spectator "the right-wing publication that regularly attacked the [Clinton] administration." But she doesn't call what she and her husband did to the Spectator "an attack" after they used the IRS, the FBI and any number of other federal agencies and the courts to "attack" the Spectator for over 14 months, costing them a LOT of money for legal fees and almost destroying them. The fact that the Spectator was not found guilty of ANYTHING escaped notice of all but the "alternative ('right-wing') media." Seems like it's only an "attack" when it's coming HER way. Last time I heard, the Spectator was just a news magazine looking for truth. There's nothing that is an "attack" about printing the truth on a regular basis, unless your activities make you a regular target, as did those of Bill Clinton and, yes, Hillary. They're both swindlers and con men/women that happened to con their way into the presidency. They'd rather lie than tell the truth, when the truth would serve better. They'd rather steal than buy, when it would be easier to buy. They stole their way to riches while in office and beyond, now they can't resist telling us how rich they are, at every opportunity. Now Hillary is trying to con her way back into the White House, this time with HER in the "cat-bird seat." I hope this country isn't dumb enough to put that pair back in the White House so they can scam us out of more. I guess she's call this "an attack." Because I'm telling the truth about her. It's like the "swiftboating" tag. They use it as an epithet, assuming people  automatically see it as "lying" about somebody. In reality, the term means "telling the truth" about somebody, since the "swiftboaters" have never been found to be lying. (Amazon/Dick Morris)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Don't Want To Hear It!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, April 28, 2008 8:45:13 AM
Nonie Darwish is being censored in this country because she tells the truth about Arab teachings: She says, "As Arab children, we were taught about Jews in schools, at home, in the media, at mosque sermons, and by politicians. No one can escape the overwhelming anti-Semitic propaganda and the venomous hatred that my culture of origin advocated against Jews. In Gaza elementary schools I learned hate, vengeance, and retaliation. Peace was never an option; it was considered a sign of defeat and weakness. Those who wanted peace and compromise were called traitors and cowards. When I asked 'Why do we hate Jews?,' the answer was 'Aren't you a Muslim?' We were told 'Don't take candy from strangers since it could be a Jew trying to poison you,' or that Israeli soldiers would kill pregnant Arab women just for fun, place bets on whether she was carrying a boy or a girl, and cut her open to see who won the bet. My classmates would cry while reciting jihadist poetry daily, wishing to die as martyrs." This is the kind of hatred taught by MAINSTREAM Arabs in Islamic-controlled countries. Is it any wonder it is so easy to find Arabs who are sufficiently ignorant to believe that crap about "74 virgins" to screw around with forever" and the rightness of "killing Infidels" (not just Jews, but EVERYONE who doesn't believe as THEY do) taught by the Islamic militants? They keep saying Islam is a "peaceful" religion, but the lie is put to that by this. If you don't believe this, go to an Islamic-controlled country and learn their language. Then just listen. (National Review)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Not So "Innocent" After All

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, April 28, 2008 8:38:46 AM
One Of the Imams who want to boycott an airline for "bouncing" them off a flight after they "prayed" in public and made remarks supporting Islamic terrorists before boarding their flight is NOT an "innocent "scholar" after all. He has an ADMITTED connection to Hamas and other terrorist organizations and goes about this country preaching HATE in Arabic. "World Net Daily" revealed, "The imams had attended a conference in Minneapolis of the North American Imams Federation, said Shahin, who is president of the group." Are American lawmen looking at what was taught at this conference? Probably not. The politicians in Washington are too afraid of "offending" Muslims to do what is LOGICAL in our defense. Personally, I think ALL such gatherings ought to be monitored by an Arab-speaking agent and their words reported. If they are "treasonable," they should be "brought to justice." That's only logic and common sense. As long as they can get away with calling us "racists" for keeping an eye on Muslims, we're going to lose. If the Nazis could have gotten away with that, we'd all be speaking German now. (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »