Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:44:57 PM
Hillary once called The American Spectator
"the right-wing publication that regularly attacked the [Clinton]
administration." But she doesn't call what she and her husband did to the Spectator
"an attack" after they used the IRS, the FBI and any number of other
federal agencies and the courts to "attack" the Spectator for
over 14 months, costing them a LOT of money for legal fees and almost
destroying them. The fact that the Spectator was not found guilty of
ANYTHING escaped notice of all but the "alternative
('right-wing') media." Seems like it's only an
"attack" when it's coming HER way. Last time I heard, the Spectator
was just a news magazine looking for truth. There's nothing that is an
"attack" about printing the truth on a regular basis, unless your
activities make you a regular target, as did those of Bill Clinton and, yes,
Hillary. They're both swindlers and con men/women that happened to con their
way into the presidency. They'd rather lie than tell the truth, when the truth
would serve better. They'd rather steal than buy, when it would be easier to
buy. They stole their way to riches while in office and beyond, now they can't
resist telling us how rich they are, at every opportunity. Now Hillary is
trying to con her way back into the White House, this time with HER in the
"cat-bird seat." I hope this country isn't dumb enough to put that
pair back in the White House so they can scam us out of more. I guess she's
call this "an attack." Because I'm telling the truth about her. It's
like the "swiftboating" tag. They use it as an epithet, assuming
people automatically see it as
"lying" about somebody. In reality, the term means "telling the
truth" about somebody, since the "swiftboaters" have never been
found to be lying. (Amazon/Dick Morris)