About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Sharpton "Spins" Wright

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:22:25 PM
I'm watching Al Sharpton right now on FOX, of all places, "spinning" the "Rev. Wright controversy. And they say Fox is "biased." I don't know why ANYBODY  (except liberals) would ask Al Sharpton for his opinion on ANYTHING, but apparently Fox would, and does. Do you think the liberals will now stop their campaign to paint Fox as "biased?" No. They'll ignore Fox actually asking one of this country's biggest race swindlers his opinion about Jeremiah Wright's racist rants and go right on calling Fox "biased." Truth means nothing to liberals. I put "race pimps" into Google and this is the top result. The next one was on Jesse Jackson. I didn't look further, but I'd bet "Calypso Louie) Louis Farakhan isn't far down the list. (LoneWacko blog)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Protecting Yourself From Criticism

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:13:36 PM
Have you ever noticed that all the "race pimps" out there are "Rev. this" and "Pastor that?" But nowhere is there any evidence that any of them ever went to divinity school. There's no better way to keep people from criticizing you than being "a Man of Gawd!" Islamic terrorists use it all the time, and I think they learned it from the likes of Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton and Louis Farrakhan. These bozos don't answer any criticism you might offer. They just call you a "racist.": If that doesn't work, they say it's "an attack on the black church." But nowhere is there ANY argument against the criticisms people have made. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fox Reports Attack, Liberal Media Doesn't

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:10:39 PM
American troops attacked a "terrorist stronghold," located right in the middle of a neighborhood that is home to millions of Iraq civilians and "55 yards away from a hospital." They managed to kill or capture many Islamic terrorists but the biggest part of the story, even on Fox (which the liberals continue to call "biased") was its nearness to a hospital (even though no patients were injured) and the U. S. sending a missile into a "neighborhood," killing and wounding a few civilians (who are conveniently close to the enemy's "lair.") But how do you kill the enemy if he's hiding among citizens and close to a hospital? That's where this enemy hides, hoping if we attack them in their lair, we'll accidentally kill or injure a few civilians and they can play that up in the liberal media. That is, when the liberal media bothers to report it, at all (Notice that even Fox won't call them Islamic terrorists. They still call them "militants."). (Fox News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Do We Need A Philosophy?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, May 04, 2008 1:06:50 PM
Of course we do! Everybody has a "philosophy of life." Something that guides them in the living thereof. Some people don't realize they do. If they say they have no philosophy of life, THAT is their philosophy. Most people who think they have no philosophy DO have one, but don't realize what it is and can't put it into words. But it is there and can be extracted if the right questions are asked. Objectivism is a philosophy. But is one that is rejected by those who refuse to accept the Ayn Rand Institute's contention that Objectivism must be practiced AS IS, with no changes allowed. That is "cult-like," and SHOULD be rejected. Real Objectivism is that preached and practiced by the Atlas Society, where they admit that Objectivism is NOT "complete" as is, and CAN be changed as new FACTS are found. This is "Kelley Objectivism," and that's the philosophy to which I subscribe. ARI is well known to "excommunicate" those who disagree with their ideas, and force people to do likewise if they want to associate with them. Those of you who are ARI Objectivists, don't bother to write to take me to task because we must "agree to disagree." I am not, and cannot be, an ARI Objectivist. (William Thomas)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Operation Chaos"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 03, 2008 5:20:28 PM
I am hearing calls from a lot of people who completely misunderstand Rush Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos." They think it is to capture the nomination for one candidate or the other. It is not. The whole purpose of "Operation Chaos" is to "create chaos" in the Democrat Party and force them to continue "bloodying" each other right up to, and during the convention in Denver while spending millions of dollars they would not have spent otherwise, leaving them less money to use in opposing the Republican candidate while having less time left to do so before the general election. It has succeeded beyond even Rush's wildest dreams. If either of them actually wins the general election it won't be Rush's fault. (Jo-Jo)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Tax Increase is Personal

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 03, 2008 4:57:15 PM
Personal for you, personal for me. Because it takes money we sorely need to pay our own bills out of our pockets to pay the imaginary needs of government. Government at every level is "awash in money," yet they constantly "poor mouth" us, telling us that if they don't get even more money they're going to have to stop certain REQUIRED services (That they never stop "peripheral" things such as a study of the sex life of the Tse-tse fly, we don't notice, and they don't tell us. That's what they did when Prop. 13 passed in California reducing property taxes. Because of a small loss of revenue, they threatened to cut money needed for fire and police services. They did this to frighten the "average taxpayer" into restoring revenues lost through Prop. 13. They're doing something similar in Colorado where the "TABOR Amendment" forced them to ASK PERMISSION before raising taxes, and return moneys collected above TABOR limits. They recently passed a law that allowed them to KEEP the billions of dollars they overtaxed us, WITH OUR PERMISSION. I didn't give MY permission, but they kept my money anyway. Now that Democrats are in charge again, every word out of their mouths is about how much they're going to TAKE from those capable of earning it and GIVE to those who don't. Just listen to their own words. It's "take, take, take." From all who can, and do "earn" money and "give, give, give" to those who don't or won't. Hillary talks about "taking the "excess profits" her liberal friends CREATED from the oil companies by not allowing them to search for oil in the U. S. and "forcing" them to do what they wanted to do, anyway, but having to adhere to HER idea of where to look. I'm getting really tired of seeing this, and having otherwise intelligent people buy her lies and give their PERMISSION for her to loot producers in this way while REWARDING non-producers. She even wants a "poverty czar" now, when we don't have "poverty" here like they do elsewhere. (Newt Gingrich/Human Events)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Press One for English"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, May 03, 2008 4:45:42 PM
Why should I have to "press one for English" every time I get a computer when I call anywhere for customer service? I'd bet they don't have "press one for Spanish" in Mexico.This is AMERICA! We speak ENGLISH here! Why not change that to "press one for SPANISH, or French, or even Swahili? I look at the forms sent me by the feds and see a BOOK where it used to be a post card, all because of the many different languages they must put it into, BY LAW! This is a "can of worms" we've opened by "bending over and grabbing our ankles" whenever someone "gets "offended" by having to speak ENGLISH in an "English-speaking" country! They'll call me a "racist" for this, because they can't answer the questions I raised. So they'll just "label me" and go on, figuring I'll be busy protesting that I'm NOT a racist. One time I was a security officer in a post office and got hell from an old Mexican man because I didn't speak Spanish. He seemed to think it was a "lawful requirement" if I worked in a federal establishment. I told him to "get lost." In English. I shouldn't have to go out of my way for people who REFUSE to learn our language and learn THEIRS, in MY country. If I move to a foreign country to live, I'm going to learn their language, not demand they accommodate me and learn mine. It's only right. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »