Posted by
The New THOMA$ REPORT on Friday, May 09, 2008 8:12:56 AM
Hillary, I'm sure, is attributing her foundering
campaign to the refusal of "white, Anglo-Saxon Protestants" to elect
a woman president. She's wrong. Maybe SOME people DO just not want to elect a
woman president. But most just don't want to elect THIS woman president. I'm
one of those. I'd elect Condoleeza in a minute. And she's not only a woman'
she's black. But she's also the right kind of woman and wouldn't move us closer
to socialism if elected. This is just the kind of thinking that is one of the
primary reasons I, along with many others (including half of Democrats) would
not like this woman (who thinks the job is hers "by right" of
succession) elected. But the country has spoken: they want to be RID of the
Clintons. The biggest albatross around Hillary's neck (aside from her socialist
politics, of course) is . . .Bill This is the second election he has lost for a
protégé. Research showed that whenever Bill Clinton was mentioned in the Gore
campaign, his numbers went down quicker than Bill's pants whenever he got a
chance. Ann Coulter says, "[W]e are now left with two dangerous choices
for president -- a young liberal who is friendly with terrorists or an old
liberal who is friendly with Teddy Kennedy." (Ann Coulter)