About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Search

Illegal Democrat Ad

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:12:06 PM
Remember that ad where Democrat Nancy Pelosi sat on a couch with Newt Gingrich, to tell the world Newt has "bought" the enviro-crazies' crap about global warming when REAL science has found that the world is actually "cooling:?" That ad destroyed any credibility I might have attributed to Newt. But moreover, it was ILLEGAL, since it appeared in Nancy's constituency a month before a contested election (McCain-Feingold). Does anybody expect anybody to do anything about it? Don't hold your breath unless "turning blue" is your thing. If they do, she might quietly pay a small fine and the liberal press will dutifully ignore it, as usual. (News Max)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blaming "Big OiL"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 12:55:09 PM
They're "lynching" the "big oil CEOs" again today in Washington, when they should be "lynching" themselves. They're doing their usual thing, blaming the oil companies for high oil prices when it is the "environmental crazies" who influence their votes who should be blamed for not allowing a single oil refinery to be built in the United States or anywhere it controls things, not allowing ANY oil drilling or even a search for oil within the United States. It's silly for this country NOT to be the biggest producer of oil in the world. We've certainly got the reserves underground if the environmental crazies would let us get to it. Their tactics are miserable in their efforts to block ANY effort to drill for oil in the U. S. or anywhere we "make the rules." An example is ANWR, where they claim the entire territory is a "winter wonderland" when the area in which we want to drill is like a bar of soap in the corner of a football field--and that particular area is NOT a "winter wonderland." It's like a frozen desert where nobody lives, or wants to live--except for animals, which would do better if we were there. But you'll never get them to admit that, even if positive proof is placed in front of their faces. They blame the oil companies to get people's minds off THEIR obstinate refusal to allow us to get at OUR OWN oil. They make such cracks as "America is 'addicted' to foreign oil," as if it was OUR FAULT the world's demand (with China and other populous countries using a lot more than before) has outstripped the supply. We can't even REFINE it if we could get it out of the ground, since environmentalist crazies have seen to it that not a SINGLE oil refinery has been built in more than 30 years. It amazes me that otherwise intelligent people (such as George Bush) can't see this. (Real Clear Politics)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Veto Coming Up

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:31:21 AM
They may have a "veto-proof" majority to pass this bill over Bush's wishes, but they're not going to be able to blame their excesses on him after doing it. According to Democrats, everything bad that happens is "Bush's fault." But they're not going to be able to sell it this time as they overspend our money with their socialistic notions. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Oil Crisis" But OPEC Won't Budge

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:22:38 PM
Which tells us a lot about what they're after. And it's not just money. They want to cripple the rest of the world while they "swim" in the oil money WE helped them get. They seem to forget WE found the oil, drilled for it, brought it out of the ground, and let them subsequently "nationalize" their oil companies, thus taking over control of a large portion of the world's oil supply. Iraq is not about oil, but maybe it should be. Maybe we should "go after" the OPEC countries that hold a large portion of our oil futures in their hands. Up to now, they've not tried to exercise that control in an inordinate way. But they are, now, with oil prices (today) at $130 a barrel. Is there a real reason why oil prices should have skyrocketed in such a manner? I don't think so, or they would be talking a lot about it. It's money, and it's power. They have the power to make the oil prices skyrocket, and they're doing so with abandon. This needs to be stopped, in some way. I don't know if it's worth a war, but sometimes things are. (Advertising Age)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Demagoguery

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:00:56 PM
"The difference between Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright is that they are addressing different audiences, using different styles adapted to those audiences. It is a difference between upscale demagoguery and ghetto demagoguery, playing the audience for suckers in both cases. People on the far left like to flatter themselves that they are for the poor and the downtrodden. But what is most likely to lift people out of poverty--telling them that the world has done them wrong or promoting the work ethic of the Korean girls, the dogged determination of my Harvard classmate with the newspaper in his shoe, or the self-reliance of my fellow junior high school student in Harlem who had too much pride to take charity?" what, indeed? Liberals like to say they're "for the poor," but what do they want? The "poor" to depend on THEM more and more. They'll give them just enough to "get by" while they depend on their "liberal friends" for their very daily bread. And they're willing to sell their votes dearly to "keep the goodies coming." (Professor Thomas Sowell)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Sexist Campaign"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:57:02 PM

Hillary surrogate Geraldine Ferraro says the only reason Hillary is losing is "because she's a girl." They all "jump on her." Poor baby! Seems to me there's a little more to it than sexism, though. Hillary is a "dedicated socialist" who wants to "take things" from people who EARN it and GIVE them to people who don't. That's socialism. It is one form of collectivism, whose entire reason for living is to TAKE from those who EARN and GIVE that taken to those who don't. Another form is communism. Does Geraldine think that has nothing to do with it? It's easy to say it's "sexism" or in Obama's case "racism." That allows them to ignore the other reasons why people aren't voting for them. The "Hatemonger" web site says: "According to this self-proclaimed feminist, it is sexist to treat female candidates for president according to the exact same standards as male candidates, since they are clearly more delicate [Emphasis mine. -RT]. Thus John Edwards and his ilk are degenerate women-haters because they dared to offer extended criticism of a lady." I hate to cite this site because they are in a constant search for racists. But their words, in this case, are "right on." Treating women and men candidates exactly alike is "racist" or "sexist," according to Geraldine. (Real Clear Politics)

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/01/medias_sexism_unfair_to_clinton.html

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Free Koran?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:14:59 PM
"If you're in your front yard, working in the flower bed or chatting with a neighbor, they'll pass by silently to attach one of the bags they're carrying to your front door knob and leave without speaking or engaging you in debate. Their mission? To place a copy of the Quran in every home in the United States." Not MY home! If they do that to me, they can come back later and find it in the trash. There's no way they'll ever convince me, or any member of my family to convert to a stupid religion like that, so they'd be wasting it on my doorstep. I have no use for such crap. I wouldn't have it in the house. (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"The Power of God"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:09:37 PM
"The Illinois Department of Children and Family Services erroneously labeled 3,051 innocent people as child abusers by placing them on the state's official list." And the law requires that once you get on the list, innocent or guilty, you have to remain there for five years. That this can ruin your life doesn't seem to matter. 'They're not all bad, there are good ones,' Nick Brunstein reportedly said of state child abuse investigators, 'but the bad ones have the power of God, and with the stroke of a pen they can ruin your life.' " And they do it routinely in ALL states. These people have WAY too much power. They need to be "reined in." (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Dying Man Has No Enemies

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 2:51:30 PM
Ted Kennedy has a malignant brain tumor. Everybody, including most of his worst enemies, are "stumbling over" each other trying to say good things about him. I will not join that chorus, although I will try and refrain from making nasty cracks about "swimming off and letting his pregnant girlfriend to die" or making a "waitress sandwich" with help from a friend (usually another Kennedy), and even "environmentalist Kennedy" dumping diesel fuel into Nantucket Bay. I just listened to a Fox reporter trying his best to say something good about Teddy and all he could come up with was that he was "a hard man for a reporter to pin down" in the hall, even though he couldn't stand very long, due to his problems with his legs. Personally, I can find NO "nice things" to say about him, so I won't even try. It's obvious others are having problems finding good things to say about him, too, for all I've been hearing are platitudes about him being "a fighter all his life." My father died of a brain tumor back in 1981, when they had no Cat-Scans (I think) with which to make an early diagnosis--and we all know "early diagnosis" is something that can be life-saving, and HE was "a fighter.". I'd say that's the only chance Teddy  has. I just heard a Fox News commentator say "he's a fighter, and we need fighters." I don't agree that we need his kind of fighter in the Senate, but that illustrates their determination to say SOMETHING good about him and their frustration in being able to find nothing real. (Fox News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »