About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Ricky Martin "Endorses" Hillary"

So what? Who cares what "rock stars" think? Does being a rock star confer on them any special knowledge? I don't think so. Most of them can't sing, anyway, and their chief "talent" is in convincing young, impressionable teenagers that they can. My guess is that this "endorsement" was made as a publicity stunt to get him some "press" and restart his flagging career. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Next Supreme Court Justice

The lists I've seen of people who are being seriously considered for nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States frighten me. The president doesn't matter as much, except he/she gets to nominate the next Supreme Court Justice. But, once confirmed the new justice can't be removed, unless he/she commits a terrible crime (as defined by Congress and the president). Major crimes committed by their decisions don't count. If they decide something based on their own personal opinions and biases rather than on the Constitution, as they are directed to do, the only thing that can happen is for Congress to reverse them--which ain't gonna happen easily with all the liberals lurking there. One such is Janet Reno, the "Butcher of Waco," and the woman who sent an innocent 6-year-old back to Cuba to communist slavery, even though the situation wasn't even any of her business. The kinds of decisions she would make as Justice really make me want to barf all over this keyboard.

How ANYBODY with any brains at all could seriously consider this woman as a Supreme Court Justice, I don't know. But a résumé like hers makes her a "good choice" for liberals, most of which don't have any brains. Then there is Democrat Sen. Patrick (Leaky) Leahy, who lost the chairmanship of one committee because he couldn't keep his mouth shut about national security secrets; Democrat Socialist Sen. Diane Feinstein, who waved around a loaded machine gun in an "anti-gun" rally, not knowing it was nothing like what she was promoting the banning thereof. There are many bad choices, most of which are high on the Democrats' lists to replace one of four Justices old enough to retire any time. John Paul Stevens, who is 88 years old, to old to be making the decisions required of a Supreme Court Justice; Ruth Bader Ginsberg, appointed by liberal Bill Clinton, who has already had a serious bout with cancer; Antonin Scalia, who is 72 (one year older than I am and I wouldn't even consider taking that job because of my age); and Anthony Kennedy, the same age. The Supreme Court is "supremely important" in our lives, as witness the millions of dead babies caused by the "Roe v. Wade" decision and the other tragedies caused by liberal votes. The next Supreme Court nominee is of vital importance to you and I. Don't let a liberal like Hillary or Obama make it. Another horrible thought: What if either Obama or Hillary become president and nominate the other? Migawd! We'd be doomed! (Save The Court)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Coming Recession"

Why, after all these years of economic boom, are we now afraid of a "recession? I heard a man the other day say, forget a "recession." We're in a "full-blown Depression." What ignorance that shows. That man isn't old enough to know what a depression is! Yet he's "spreading the word" that one is not only "coming," we're IN one now! Which is exactly what CREATES recessions and depressions. Not economic problems. People "spreading the word" about a "coming recession," plus the propaganda, day after day by liberals, will cause one to soon come into being. Especially now with the Democrats (liberals, socialists) in "power" in Congress and with the danger of having a liberal president after the next election. People are "scared to death" of a "new depression," something they haven't seen since about the time I was being born, mostly because of the tax cuts brought about by John Kennedy (before they killed him) and Ronald Reagan and in spite of eight years of Bill Clinton trying his best to destroy the economy as well as the military and the CIA, plus the four year disaster of the Jimmy Carter years. Yes, we may be "heading into a recession," but wouldn't be if the Democrats weren't "in charge" and threatening to be in charge of ALL THREE of the parts of government. If they make it, we'll be the next "Soviet Union" in the world. (MSN Money) 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »