About Me

Name:The New THOMA$ REPORT
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

You Can't Say That, Either!

Government agencies, including the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, and the National Counter Terrorism Center, for some silly reason, are denying us the right to use such words as “jihad,” “Islamist,” “Islamofascism,” and “caliphate,” among others. Yes, for now they're only denying that right to government employees. But soon they'll mount a campaign to make laws or regulations to stop EVERYBODY from using those words. Why are they doing this? They don't want to "offend" Islamic people. They seem to forget the First Amendment. Frankly, I don't CARE if people of Islamic descent are "offended" by MY use of these words. I will continue to use them until an unconstitutional law is made against it and they put me in jail for it. They also don't like the term, "Muslim community." What stupidity! And these are the people who are running this country? (Front Page Magazine)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama "Livid"

He's livid at John McCain for blaming HIM for the high fuel prices. Never mind that he voted against allowing us to drill domestically for oil, a practice that would eventually ELIMINATE our dependence on foreign oil. He and his liberal friends have consistently BLOCKED every move the Republicans have made to solve this problem, while pushing their ineffective "solutions" that have never proven themselves to work--while oil has kept this country going for many years before the liberals cut off our domestic supply. They keep saying "domestic drilling won't help for many years," so why bother? I say, at least, fossil oil has PROVEN itself to work, if we'll let it. Their "solutions" have not. Meanwhile, their blockage has CAUSED extremely high fuel prices, which have caused high transportation costs, which have created the recession that liberals have been predicting. And he's mad about being blamed? He and his liberal (socialist) friends ARE to blame. (CBS News)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No "Political Prisoners" in America

Oh, no? Not maybe by YOUR definition. It's a "hallmark" of the "dictator" that he has the laws written in such a way as to penalize his opponents unduly for opposing him. He did in this case, where an unpopular (with politicians) tax activist who has stopped $25 million in tax increases had the temerity to TELL THE TRUTH about a politician who had smeared dog poop all over his neighbor for objecting to that poop being in his yard without a few "required" words being on the flier he passed out. This politician got a "slap on the wrist" for the "dog poop incident" and it no doubt made his win in the election thinner. But he has the Florida Attorney General file 14 CHARGES against this man, one for every person who got a copy of the flier (which the court threw out) and STILL got him $8,000 in fines and 60 days in jail. They conned him into thinking he could pay a small fine and not even have a conviction on his record, so he pled guilty. He could have gotten 4,000 years in jail! "The speech regulators no longer engage in mere civil harassment: now they apply the handcuffs and iron bars." For my part, anybody who can deprive the government of $25 billion (with a "B") in tax money is a "good guy." And I can readily see why the Attorney General was so willing to put this man in prison for such a miniscule "crime." At least he didn't smear his "victim" with dog poop. The flier he distributed didn't even fit the description contained in the law under which he was railroaded. It contained NO recommendation to vote for ANYBODY. It was simply his "free speech" and what they did to him was patently unconstitutional. If I were in Florida, they could do it to ME for this blog item. What a load! (Paul Jacob/Town Hall)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Is WRONG With Liberals?

They must be suffering just like we are from high fuel prices and all the things they bring, including higher prices for products that have to be shipped--which is all of them, in one way or another, but they keep on obstructing ANY effort to do what is necessary to be able to stop importing $700 billion dollars' worth of oil a year and start using oil from our own country where nobody (but liberals) hate us. I guess they'd rather see gasoline and other fuel prices go "through the roof" than lose an election. I guess they figure they're good enough at fooling this ignorant public that doesn't pay attention to politics, anyway, even though politics is at the bottom of all their problems. Frankly, if more people would simply "pay more attention" to politics, we'd be able to reverse their effect on us. Rush Limbaugh says "Liberals are funny when they're out of power. But when they're IN power. They're dangerous." He couldn't be more right. Their policies, since they took over Congress (and before) have LED to the current fuel crunch. 

And they wonder why some people blame Obama for rising fuel prices, leading to rising prices all over the map, since just about everything must be shipped and shippers have to PAY those higher shipping prices that come from higher fuel prices. Liberals "quiver with anger" when anyone suggests they're responsible for the current crisis, AND the "softening economy (that inevitably follows) but it is unmistakably their policies that caused it. And if Obama is elected it will just make the problem worse. In short, it is liberal (environmental extremist) policies that CAUSED the fuel prices to go up precipitously, which caused shipping costs to rise, which caused prices to rise all over the market That should be simple enough for even people who don't pay attention, and impossible for liberals to argue against. "In the throes of the Great Gasoline Crisis of 2008, many irate citizens are wrongly blaming President Bush and the Republicans for it all, vowing to install veto-proof Democrat majorities in both chambers of congress and a socialist black Muslim (sic) as president come November. My fellow Americans, electing liberal Democrats to deal with the gasoline crisis makes about as much sense as hiring members of the MS-13 gang to manage U.S. border patrol. Or trusting Bill Clinton as your guiding light for marital fidelity and sexual modesty" These people actually think we can't see these things--and for the most part, they're right, as long as most of us "don't pay attention to politics." (John Lillpop)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What The Hell For?

Obama still seems to think it is incumbent upon US to learn to speak Spanish to accommodate our Mexican immigrants who can't be bothered to learn OUR language, legal or ILLegal. I don't think so. If I were to move to, say, France, to LIVE, I would expect to learn French, instead of DEMANDING that the French people accommodate ME and learn my language to make things easy for ME. I'm NOT going to learn ANY foreign language to "cater" to immigrants who can't be bothered to learn MY language, which is the language of the country in which they now reside. Think about it. If we "open that can of worms" AND give in to this, there are NO END to the number of languages we will have to learn to speak to satisfy other immigrants if they don't want to bother to learn OUR language. Who the hell does Obama think he is? By the way; does HE speak Spanish? (Mallard Fillmore)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »