About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Questions for Daschle

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:47:00 PM
 Who paid for his car and driver; and what did that “benefactor” want from Daschle, a “washed-up” former senator? And did he/she get it? If so, was the whole deal illegal? Seems to me people don’t ever ask enough questions in times like these. That’s why politicians do things like this. The people they make the rules for never follow those rules themselves and no one asks any questions. But this is only on the Democrat side. They don’t ask questions about what Democrats do, but they always DO with Republicans. Such as Barney Frank remaining in the Congress and having a lot of powerful posts after his boyfriend was caught running a gay whorehouse out of Frank’s apartment and nothing important happening to Frank while  REPUBLICAN congressman is forced to RESIGN because a “gay-hater” cop “thought” he was “asking for gay sex” in a men’s room. This kind of a double-standard is common, and NOBODY asks any questions about it. (Just common sense)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Frustration!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:33:13 PM
"A member of Britain's government says couples should be limited to two children to save the Earth from global warming. It's discouraging that such muddle-headed people are in positions of power." And yet they are. Here, AND there. They’re “running things” into the ground, and most people don’t notice because they “don’t pay attention to politics,” as if politics would not pay attention to THEM. But politics WILL. In ways they could not imagine, because they can’t feature their “leaders” being that stupid. Like Tom Daschle never realizing that the car and driver being provided by a rich constituent was “income.” Sheesh! (IBD Editorials)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Terrorists Deserve No Rights!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:28:29 PM
I don’t give a damn what our newly-elected president says. People who kill indiscriminately to “make a point” do not deserve “rights.” They will BEHEAD you if they capture you, so why should ANYBODY be “concerned” about our treatment of them? Liberals say our treatment of them will affect their treatment of prisoners. It will not. They have proven that, time after time. Their status is “questionable” when they’re captured. I say send them to Allah if they’re caught in the Act of killing innocents. That’s the best way to deal with them. (One News Now)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why No Outrage?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 03, 2009 4:26:06 PM
Obama has reversed Bush’s policy not to have the government pay for abortions (the killing of innocent, defenseless infants before they even have a chance to live), since he is KNOWN to have supported a measure (at least in “Illinois) to deny medical attention to just-born infants who have survived a botched abortion attempt. This is the kind of man we have elected president. Why is there no outrage over this premeditated murder that Obama voted to continue? (One News Now)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

War is Bad

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 01, 2009 3:24:46 PM
I agree. If we could live without war, we should. Unfortunately, there are people in this world who want what is ours; what WE have earned, and they’re willing to kill to get it. As individuals, we call these people criminals and send them to prison; but when a government (not ours) does it, we call it war (If ours does it, we call it socialism). When people decide to take what we have earned, and are willing to kill to accomplish it, we MUST “go to war” to stop them. If we don’t, they will simply TAKE whatever they want. “War haters” are correct. I hate war, too. I wish we could live without it. The best way to answer people who say war should NEVER be entered into under ANY circumstances is to go up to them and hit them in the chops. See if they will hit you back. If they don’t, hit them again, and start reaching into their pockets and taking what you want. See if they try to stop you or just “give it up” (That’s the INDIVIDUAL definition of war). If we could live without war, I’d be the first to support it. But we can’t. If we really tried, we’d lose everything. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President Greg Craig

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 01, 2009 3:21:21 PM
Liberals have said many times that Bush’s chief of staff or his vice-president were “running him,” but they weren’t. They were never able to prove their contention. But in Obama’s case, it only took two days in office to show that HE is being “run” by Greg Craig (who is running HIM I don't know). Twice while signing executive orders to close Guantanamo that he apparently has (obviously) not read, had to turn to Craig for “guidance.” The same day, his new press secretary had to do likewise when asked a substantive question by a reporter. Who IS Greg Craig? And why does he have so much influence on not only the president, but other staffers, as well? We elected Obama, not Greg Craig. Why should he be “running things” so much so that even the president had to defer to him? (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »