About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Inarticulate?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:43:17 PM
That’s what liberals say about Sarah Palin. That she can’t properly express herself; that she’s “just a back-woods hick (the liberals’ words) who lucked into the governorship. But they’re (as usual) wrong. She was (outside of Obama) the most articulate candidate in the presidential race in 2008; and if she runs at the top of the ticket in 2012 (without McCain to “muzzle her” so she can’t say ALL the things she COULD have said), she’ll win in a landslide; especially if she has somebody like Bobby Jindal as her running mate. And liberals are “in terror” at that possibility, since they “shot their wad” getting Obama and the rest of the “top-level swindlers” elected, thereby accomplishing a “bloodless (I think) coup to take over the U. S. government. They’re now reporting that she “resigned” as Governor of Alaska, (which is true, but not the whole story, as usual). What she said on her “Twitter” page is that she simply announced she would not be running for re-election when her term ended. And that, rather than be a “lame duck,” she’s resigning so the Lt. Governor (who will rise to the office of governor) has nothing “holding him back” while Alaska pays a “lame-duck governor” to run around making speeches.

They say as a reason that she has had to spend too much money defending herself against all the (phony) charges being laid against her (ALL of which, so far, have failed). But if those charges are related to her governorship, it would be legal for the state itself to pay those legal bills (though she doesn’t want to drain the state that way unnecessarily). And they think she is stupid enough to think resigning will stop the attacks. Whether she’s actually resigning makes no difference to her presidential possibilities. That makes them “wet their pants (or dresses)”. What REALLY scares them is that she’ll have more time to devote to a winning campaign. They know that every time an “unashamed conservative” runs AS a conservative (not as “liberal lite" CLAIMING to be conservative), they DO win in a landslide. Reagan did it twice. He’s dead and they’re still “badmouthing” him. Which means they’re still afraid of him. I hope this country can survive Obama long enough for her to “kick him out of office” and start repairing the damage he will have done. Reagan did it to Jimmy Carter and I hope she will do it to Obama. She used a basketball metaphor I think is apt: she’s “passing the ball” to other players on her team” to “get things done.” She is by no means “quitting.” As General MacArthur said, she’s “advancing in another direction.” In resigning, she's giving her "middle finger" to both the Republicans (who don't want her to say what should be said) and the Democrats, who just want to be rid of her because she could mess up their carefully crafted scams. (Palin’s Announcement)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They're Afraid of Sarah

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:29:30 PM
John Kerry has exposed the Democrat Party’s fear of Sarah Palin. He says he “wishes she’d disappear” like Gov. Sanford did, only permanently. That tells me a lot more than he wanted to tell me. It tells me that Sarah Palin is the “boogy man” for the Democrats. They’re so afraid of her they literally “wet their pants” every time they even hear her name. I think if she runs for president in 2012, especially if her running mate is Bobby Jindal, and she runs as an “unashamed conservative,” she’ll win in a landslide, as Ronald Reagan did, twice. That scares the pants off Democrats. They managed to con the country into electing Obama and the rest of the socialist crowd by creating the “economic downturn” (which they’re making worse with their use of the discredited Keynesian Economics as their guide) and they’re afraid she’ll tell the truth they don’t want us to know. They’re right. (American Family Association)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Afraid

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:23:49 PM
They’re desperately trying to keep the world from knowing about the “thuggery” they’re using in a desperate attempt to forestall a revolution that might topple the current “government.” They’ve threatened ANY protesters with death, or worse (and they've carried out that threat). They’ve gone to subway exits and used tear gas to keep demonstrators from getting on the streets. They’ve beaten other demonstrators with nightsticks and fists. They’re trying their best to censor ALL news that comes out of Iran. Unfortunately, with technology what it is, the “blackout” is not complete. Unlike years ago in Tiananmen Square, in China, where we had to depend on smuggled-out videos, today we can get pictures, sometimes in “real time,” on the Internet, no matter how hard they work to stop it. Even if this doesn’t become a revolution, it has “sowed the seeds” of revolution for later. I’d say the “supreme leader” isn’t long for this world, and Ahmadjinijerk better start packing his bags. If you look at Iranian government-controlled media, nothing very important is happening in Iran today. But we know better. I’ll be watching, and cheering for the overthrow of these dictators.(BBC)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Closing Only Republican Dealerships?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:19:27 PM
I’ve been wondering about his reason for closing down auto dealerships “to make things better” in the auto industry. Closing down dealerships that have been contributing BILLIONS of dollars in PROFITS to the auto manufacturers just didn’t seem logical. But now I see the logic behind it. He’s only closing dealerships belonging to people who contributed to the REPUBLICANS! The Patriot Depot says, “The basic issue raised here is this: How do we account for the fact millions of dollars were contributed to GOP candidates by Chrysler who are being closed by the government, but only one has been found so far that is being closed that contributed to the Obama campaign in 2008?” If someone can show me (with proof) a DEMOCRAT contributor who has been closed down, I’d like to see it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm Baaack!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, July 06, 2009 4:39:27 PM
The liberals can return to being nervous about me while I continue to tell the truth about them, which they hate. I have buried my brother and interacted with my family. The next time I go there I hope it’s not for a funeral. Not even my own. He’s in a much better place, now. I am now the “patriarch” of the family and, though I didn’t want the job, I’m going to keep it as long as I can. Bob and Rick (my next younger brother) are responsible for me doing what I’m doing today after insisting I read Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged.” While Bob introduced me to Rush Limbaugh. The first time I ever listened to him was while sitting on Bob’s porch. Rest easy, Bob. I’m going to carry on the work as long as I can.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Violently?"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, July 06, 2009 4:37:07 PM
This quote comes from a young woman who knows NOTHING about what’s going on in the world, yet makes such opinions known when some liberal asks her for her “uninformed opinion. “Supporters of reform candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, upset at their announced loss and suspicions of voter fraud, took to the streets both peacefully and, in some cases, violently to vent their frustrations.” Violently? Not EVEN. They were peaceful to a fault. It was the Mullah’s cops who did ALL the violence. They didn’t protest Saddam Hussein’s “100% victory” in Iran because they KNEW they would die. They would meet the same fate as the 10% of voters in a previous election where he got “90%” met (death). But here they THOUGHT they would get some SUPPORT, at least, from America. I guess they were “deadly wrong.” (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Not Criticizing Obama"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, July 06, 2009 4:34:00 PM
That’s what George Bush’s speech did not do, according to Republicans. And he didn’t, although Obama “takes unnecessary swipes” at him in every speech (every time he mentions the “problems we inherited" most of which they didn't). But it’s time Bush DID criticize Obama when he does something stupid, which is every day. He criticized his POLICIES, which the Obama camp will CALL “criticizing Obama.” I think ALL Republicans ought to “criticize Obama” at every turn, with details. No generalizations. These are the only people the Americans will hear while criticizing him. Somebody NEEDS to listen to criticism of Obama from people “in the know.” (Washington Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Dems Hate Glenn Beck

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Monday, July 06, 2009 4:24:19 PM
It’s easy. He’s EFFECTIVE. It’s the same reason they hate Sarah Palin with a passion, or why they despise Rush Limbaugh. They all talk “common sense” and they can’t stand that. They’d be “all over me” if they knew I existed and I got to as many people as they do. You can always depend on the liberals to tell you who the people are who are hurting them by the way they insult them, attempt to belittle them, and try to “shut them up.” Glenn may even surpass rush in the next few years. He’s as believable (to those with intelligence) without the “bombast” the liberals so hate and which is just part of his (Rush's) “schtick.” Those who hate people like Beck and Limbaugh do so because of what they’ve heard from liberals, not because they’re wrong on anything. On the contrary; they’re RIGHT, more often than not—and that’s what the liberals hate with a passion. The liberals and their dupes don’t listen to or read what those people say. They rely on the lies liberals tell them. (Atlasphere/John Stossel)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »