About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

Newspapers Failing

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:43:01 PM
And they can’t figure out why, mostly because they are “in denial.” My nephew told me the “Indianapolis News” was gone, while the "Rocky Mountain News" is likewise gone. I well remember the failure of the “Indianapolis Times,” one of the early victims. Old "Rocky" employees are (again) starting a paid web site as a means of still being able to use their writing skills to make a living. I wish them well, although their idea of why their newspaper failed is wrong. People are just getting tired of the same old liberal claptrap in their pages and the same fate will likely befall their web site, as it did their first one last year if they don’t change that. It's not just the "Rocky Mountain News" and the "Indianapolis News." It's newspapers all over the world. The "Seattle Post-Intelligencer" is also closing, as are several San Francisco papers. The "New York Times" is "bleeding cash" and may not last another year. The "Los Angeles Times" is also in trouble. Many other papers in the U. S. as well as other countries, whose demise doesn't make nearly as much noise when they fail, are going "down the tubes."

The entire newspaper industry is the "buggy whip industry" of today as "time moves on." They are failing partly because of the Internet, where you can get news directly from both local and news sources in other countries without the Associated Press as a “middle man,” but mostly because of the liberal CONTENT. They just don’t recognize that. There is liberal content on the Internet today, too. But you aren’t forced to read it as you are when your only choice is your local newspaper (which is liberal-leaning) and the (likewise liberal-leaning) national news media on “over-the-air” television. That is also changing, as Fox News (the only cable network today that tells both sides) creeps up on them. They’re (rightly) frightened of Fox, for the same reason liberal politicians “wet their pants” at the mention of Sarah Palin’s name. They (and she) tell the TRUTH about what’s happening today unashamedly—and they can’t stand that. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pesticides Are Bad!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:35:34 PM
That's what they say. But isn’t that the whole idea? If they weren’t bad for pests, what GOOD are they? So they’re bad for humans, too. So don’t use them on humans. Use them carefully and keep them away from humans. They banned DDT in most of the world to save a few lives lost by its careless use (rather than stop its careless use). So MILLIONS of people died of Malaria, which DDT had all but eradicated. Malaria is again a major problem because, while we DO have an effective pesticide that DID almost eradicate it, we refuse to use it. Stupid! (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nuking Korea?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:32:17 PM
Maybe. Then maybe it’s only a contingency plan to use if that pot-bellied dictator carries out his irrational threat to “go to war” with the United States (and the world) if we stop and search ONE of his ships. If he does, he’s a dead man and his entire country will be a steaming pile of something else than the steaming pile of “brown stuff” it is now. This man is completely insane if he thinks he has ANY chance of winning a war with the United States. Not even a nuclear war. What does he have? One or two nuclear devices he has just now figured out how to deliver (maybe) to a target? Compared to the thousands of nuclear devices we have, coupled with our proven ability to deliver them to targets? I’d hate to be living in N. Korea today. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Inarticulate?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:43:17 PM
That’s what liberals say about Sarah Palin. That she can’t properly express herself; that she’s “just a back-woods hick (the liberals’ words) who lucked into the governorship. But they’re (as usual) wrong. She was (outside of Obama) the most articulate candidate in the presidential race in 2008; and if she runs at the top of the ticket in 2012 (without McCain to “muzzle her” so she can’t say ALL the things she COULD have said), she’ll win in a landslide; especially if she has somebody like Bobby Jindal as her running mate. And liberals are “in terror” at that possibility, since they “shot their wad” getting Obama and the rest of the “top-level swindlers” elected, thereby accomplishing a “bloodless (I think) coup to take over the U. S. government. They’re now reporting that she “resigned” as Governor of Alaska, (which is true, but not the whole story, as usual). What she said on her “Twitter” page is that she simply announced she would not be running for re-election when her term ended. And that, rather than be a “lame duck,” she’s resigning so the Lt. Governor (who will rise to the office of governor) has nothing “holding him back” while Alaska pays a “lame-duck governor” to run around making speeches.

They say as a reason that she has had to spend too much money defending herself against all the (phony) charges being laid against her (ALL of which, so far, have failed). But if those charges are related to her governorship, it would be legal for the state itself to pay those legal bills (though she doesn’t want to drain the state that way unnecessarily). And they think she is stupid enough to think resigning will stop the attacks. Whether she’s actually resigning makes no difference to her presidential possibilities. That makes them “wet their pants (or dresses)”. What REALLY scares them is that she’ll have more time to devote to a winning campaign. They know that every time an “unashamed conservative” runs AS a conservative (not as “liberal lite" CLAIMING to be conservative), they DO win in a landslide. Reagan did it twice. He’s dead and they’re still “badmouthing” him. Which means they’re still afraid of him. I hope this country can survive Obama long enough for her to “kick him out of office” and start repairing the damage he will have done. Reagan did it to Jimmy Carter and I hope she will do it to Obama. She used a basketball metaphor I think is apt: she’s “passing the ball” to other players on her team” to “get things done.” She is by no means “quitting.” As General MacArthur said, she’s “advancing in another direction.” In resigning, she's giving her "middle finger" to both the Republicans (who don't want her to say what should be said) and the Democrats, who just want to be rid of her because she could mess up their carefully crafted scams. (Palin’s Announcement)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They're Afraid of Sarah

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:29:30 PM
John Kerry has exposed the Democrat Party’s fear of Sarah Palin. He says he “wishes she’d disappear” like Gov. Sanford did, only permanently. That tells me a lot more than he wanted to tell me. It tells me that Sarah Palin is the “boogy man” for the Democrats. They’re so afraid of her they literally “wet their pants” every time they even hear her name. I think if she runs for president in 2012, especially if her running mate is Bobby Jindal, and she runs as an “unashamed conservative,” she’ll win in a landslide, as Ronald Reagan did, twice. That scares the pants off Democrats. They managed to con the country into electing Obama and the rest of the socialist crowd by creating the “economic downturn” (which they’re making worse with their use of the discredited Keynesian Economics as their guide) and they’re afraid she’ll tell the truth they don’t want us to know. They’re right. (American Family Association)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iran Afraid

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:23:49 PM
They’re desperately trying to keep the world from knowing about the “thuggery” they’re using in a desperate attempt to forestall a revolution that might topple the current “government.” They’ve threatened ANY protesters with death, or worse (and they've carried out that threat). They’ve gone to subway exits and used tear gas to keep demonstrators from getting on the streets. They’ve beaten other demonstrators with nightsticks and fists. They’re trying their best to censor ALL news that comes out of Iran. Unfortunately, with technology what it is, the “blackout” is not complete. Unlike years ago in Tiananmen Square, in China, where we had to depend on smuggled-out videos, today we can get pictures, sometimes in “real time,” on the Internet, no matter how hard they work to stop it. Even if this doesn’t become a revolution, it has “sowed the seeds” of revolution for later. I’d say the “supreme leader” isn’t long for this world, and Ahmadjinijerk better start packing his bags. If you look at Iranian government-controlled media, nothing very important is happening in Iran today. But we know better. I’ll be watching, and cheering for the overthrow of these dictators.(BBC)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Closing Only Republican Dealerships?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 07, 2009 4:19:27 PM
I’ve been wondering about his reason for closing down auto dealerships “to make things better” in the auto industry. Closing down dealerships that have been contributing BILLIONS of dollars in PROFITS to the auto manufacturers just didn’t seem logical. But now I see the logic behind it. He’s only closing dealerships belonging to people who contributed to the REPUBLICANS! The Patriot Depot says, “The basic issue raised here is this: How do we account for the fact millions of dollars were contributed to GOP candidates by Chrysler who are being closed by the government, but only one has been found so far that is being closed that contributed to the Obama campaign in 2008?” If someone can show me (with proof) a DEMOCRAT contributor who has been closed down, I’d like to see it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »