About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Twisting the Facts

They keep twisting the facts in the Prof. Gates vs. The Cambridge cops case. They keep saying he was “arrested in his own home.” That’s a lie. He was arrested OUTSIDE of his home after he had FOLLOWED this cop to his car while continuing to berate him and call him a racist until the cop finally got tired of it and arrested him for disorderly conduct. That changes the whole thing, which is why the “race-baiters” (like Prof. Gates and Obama) won’t tell you the truth. He says he’s going to sue, but he can’t. He knows he can’t prove in court the things he has convinced the public are true because the cops have him on tape. Meanwhile, the cop may sue him for defamation of character. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Global Warming Swindle Slowing

AlGore is worried. His global warming (now called “climate change”) swindle is slowing down. After fooling some otherwise intelligent individuals such as Newt Gingrich, Nancy Pelosi, and George Bush, they’re finding it harder and harder to get anybody with a modicum of intelligence to “buy” their swindle. Gore is now a multi-millionaire from his swindle, and is now even a Nobel Laureate, thus showing that ANYONE can get a Nobel Prize today; all you have to do is fool the Nobel people into thinking what you’re doing is real, and not a scam. He’s still the “Pope” of the “global warning” (now “climate change”) religion and still has many acolytes (believers who will never be convinced, even in the face of sure proof, that his scam is a swindle). Oh; the reason it is no longer called “global warming” is that this globe has not BEEN “warming” since 2000. He changed its name so he could keep on claiming that whatever happened was because of “man-made climate change.” (CO2 Change)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Pork, Huh?

“Obama boasted that his near-trillion-dollar stimulus bill contained ‘no earmarks,’ but in fact it was bursting with pork for favored constituencies -- including billions for the folks (and critters) back home in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's district and in Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's Nevada.” (Human Events) How does Obama define “earmarks?” Apparently not the same way we do. ‘Could it be he’s LYING? (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »