About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Harry Reid Sinks to New Low

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 28, 2010 7:01:36 PM
“Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) is running scared -- and now he's sunk to a new low!. Falling increasingly behind in the polls, Reid's cronies have reportedly launched a fake new "Tea Party" political party being formed to help Harry Reid save his re-election bid. The fake "Tea Party" is apparently a scam to split the conservative vote in November, and thus provide a means for Reid to win re-election.  The leader of this fake "Nevada Tea Party" is a 2008 Obama supporter who represents male porn star John Wayne Bobbitt.  Remember him?  His wife was Lorena Bobbitt, and she made an alteration to his body below the belt -- enough said.” On March 27th, the real “Tea Party” is planning a big rally in Reid’s home town of Searchlight, NV. Be alert for this phony “Tea Party” political party. The Tea Parties are NOT political parties and don’t run candidates for office. Any such “party” will be one Harry started to split the Republican vote so he can steal another election. If you wish to contribute to a REAL Tea Party, go here. (Tea Party Express III)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

You Can Always Depend On Liberals

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 28, 2010 6:56:59 PM
They’ll always tell you who scares the hell out of them. Those are the ones they try the hardest to destroy. They’ve been trying to destroy Ronald Reagan (unsuccessfully) for years. It doesn’t matter that he has been dead for years. They need to destroy what he STOOD for. Sarah Palin is the latest incarnation of Ronald Reagan (though a lot better looking) and, like Reagan, she “whups” them at every turn, which frightens them. If she runs for president in 2012 as an unashamed conservative, she’ll win in a landslide, as Reagan did, twice. In the meantime, we need to throw as many Democrats out of office as we can in the 2010 elections so Obama can’t hurt us as much as he intends during his one term. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Twists Obama's "Dog & Pony Show"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:51:58 PM
They marvel at his “command of the facts” (what facts?) his “control of the microphone” (by interrupting everybody who has something real to say and ridiculing them)  and his ability to rebut every Republican point (by ignoring them or calling them “Republican talking points”). They must have been watching something different entirely. I saw NO “rebutting” of Republican points. I saw only Obama “shutting up” Republicans almost every time they came up with a good idea. Except, that is, when we get to Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan, who managed to make several good points, none of which were “rebutted” by an interruption or him calling them “Republican talking points” while himself repeating DEMOCRAT talking points (all lies) over and over. They ignored Ryan altogether, as did Obama. We’re STILL waiting for a “rebuttal.” (Investor’s Business Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

That's Not The Way!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:48:49 PM
That’s what we should be shouting as Obama gives billions, even TRILLIONS of our dollars away to his friends and supporters, saying their business “are too big to fail.” He’s following a discredited Keynesian philosophy that you need to spend government money to improve a failing economy. This is NOT the way to do it, and that has been proved over and over. The way to improve the economy is so simple even a non-economist like me can understand it. LOWER the tax rate; leave more money in the hands of those whose investments CREATE jobs and profits.

This gives them INCENTIVE to start new projects and make more profits, not only for themselves, but for everybody else as the economy grows. This creates more taxable income. Kennedy increased the “tax take” when he did it; so did George Bush (the younger). When Reagan did it, he almost DOUBLED the “tax take.” How much more proof does anybody need that it works? But Obama and the liberals won’t listen. They want to TAKE it from you, and have the power to DECIDE who gets a cut of it, while enjoying all the power that goes along with that. (Congressman Ron Paul and common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Senator Brown, We're Watching You

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:15:28 PM
He voted with the Democrats on Obama’s latest “stimulus,” now called a “jobs bill” so he can keep on fooling us. But that doesn’t mean he will vote with them on everything, although it does give us a clear view of his leanings. His election and the “scattering” of many Democrats in the face of not being re-elected signals (more) hardship for Obama’s swindles in the near future with, or without Brown’s contribution. But Senator Brown, know that we’re watching you; and if you continue to vote with the Democrats to scam us out of our money and freedom, you’ll meet the same fate as they do in your next election. (Media Research Center)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Concentrate on Accomplishments"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, February 25, 2010 8:11:46 PM
That’s what Obama is saying to Democrats. That they should concentrate on their accomplishments, rather than on their losses. Only problem there is there are NO accomplishments for them to concentrate on. They have failed at everything they’ve tried, and are ready to fail at the rest. He’s given away BILLIONS to “stimulate the economy,” with NO effect. He “took over”
GM, hoping to help them make more profit, though he hasn’t the slightest idea how. In fact, he HATES profit, which is the “lubrication” that makes the wheels of the world turn. He doesn’t know HOW to make the economy better, and won’t even LISTEN to those who do. He THINKS he does, but everything he does makes it worse. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another School Shooting

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:49:48 PM
Every school in the land is a “gun-free zone.” Which means it’s illegal to bring a gun into the school, at any time, unless you are a policeman. But crazies who shoot up schools don’t care about the law. They don’t obey laws that say they can’t take a gun into that school. I predict that the “anti-gun Nazis” will demand even more restrictive anti-gun laws as a result of the shooting on February 23, 2010 at a Jefferson County, Colorado middle school, even though such laws NEVER do anything to stop such people from shooting up a school and, in fact, make such shootings even more possible and likely by assuring the shooter there will be nobody there armed and willing to stop them. There has never been a shooing at a gun show because a potential shooter KNOWS there are guns and people willing to use them in self defense there. A uniformed, armed policeman won’t work because they KNOW he is armed and can take him out first, before anybody is ready.

I’m not suggesting they let the students be armed. I AM suggesting that teachers and staff who have a concealed carry permit be allowed to carry their guns into the school specifically so a potential shooter cannot be sure there will be no one there to stop their rampages. And I suggest those teachers and staff be ENCOURAGED to get a gun and a carry permit so there WILL be someone there who can protect these defenseless students. The same holds true elsewhere. ANYBODY who can qualify for a carry permit should be allowed to carry his gun into what is now a no-gun zone. That way, illegally armed criminals cannot ever be SURE they can shoot people at will with nobody able to defend themselves. Anti-gun laws just do NOT work, so why do we continue to make more and more, every time somebody shoots someone with an illegal gun? (Fox News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America Is Bankrupt

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:45:40 PM
Yet Obama still wants to take on 1/7 of the economy by taking over the medical profession. He SAYS it will cost us NOTHING, which displays his complete ignorance of economics. It also shows his contempt to for American people. He really thinks we are THAT stupid (too many are). I’ve seen some bad presidents, but never one THIS bad. Not even Jimmy Carter, who was so bad they (liberals, even!) came up with a “misery index” to gauge just how bad it had become. They won’t do it this time (maybe) because Obama is too tightly in control, as Jimmy wasn’t. We’re bankrupt, yet every day Obama comes up with more spending, while SAYING “we can’t continue to spend like there were no consequences.” There ARE consequences, and Obama is going to soon run into them as foreign governments (notably communist China) stop buying our debt because he’s spending WAY too much. (Lew Rockwell/Mike Rogers)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Wrong People" Get Free Speech

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:22:45 PM
That’s what the liberals are telling us with their hideous reaction to the Supreme Court striking down one section of that COMPLETELY unconstitutional McCain-Feingold (“Incumbent protection Act.”) They’re deathly afraid that corporations will begin to have some say in how this country is run, instead of the unions they favor. The Supreme Court ought to declare the ENTIRE law as unconstitutional and an impingement on the freedom of speech or EVERYBODY.  The question here is who should have the right to determine just who are "the wrong people?"  Who should GET free speech? (John Stossel/Atlasphere)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Giving Away the Internet

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, February 23, 2010 4:19:10 PM
That’s what Obama is going to do, if we don’t stop him. "Some background: The Internet came into being because of the genius work of Americans Dr.Robert E. Kahn and Dr. Vinton G. Cerf [AlGore had nothing to do with except to be the sitting vice-president during the time it became popular and well-used. –RT]. These men, while working for the Department of Defense in the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency in the early 1970s, conceived, designed, and implemented the idea of 'open-architecture networking.' This breakthrough in connectivity and networking was the birth of the Internet. What better country to protect the Internet than the United States? We invented it, and we paid for the research and implementation that made it possible.

“We are the freest, most tolerant nation on earth, we believe in the fundamental right of free speech, and we practice a free market of commerce and ideas. America has always been against censorship and has shared its invention with the world without fee or unreasonable or arbitrary restriction. The user fee to operate on the Internet is not one paid to the U.S. government; a consumer pays it to private Internet companies, who provide access to the Internet through servers for their subscribers." Now Obama wants to give it away and let control be ceded to an international organization not dedicated to freedom of speech. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama A "Conservative?"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:14:35 PM
How stupid ARE these people? Do they really think WE are stupid enough to look at Obama’s obvious SOCIALIST policies and believe he is CONSERVATIVE? Gawd, what DOLTS! This is how the biased liberal news media twists the news, hoping that a majority of people who are too busy with their own pursuits (except liberals, many of whom don’t even have jobs) will believe that crap. What a load of stinky brown stuff they’re trying to shove down our throats! Obama is as conservative as I am liberal! (I AM liberal, but the kind of liberal that doesn’t resemble liberalism, today). I am a “classical liberal.” Something that many of this country’s founders were. The nearest thing to classical liberalism of that day today is conservatism/libertarianism, but not 100% of either. The Democrats "created the middle class?" More stinky brown stuff! (Media Research Center)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Voluntary Taxes?"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, February 21, 2010 2:07:07 PM
I’ve always wondered how the feds managed to con us into believing the income tax was “voluntary,” since they will fine you heavily and even send you to PRISON if you don’t pay it. This “Garfield” strip makes it plain how they think. If you don't "volunteer" to pay it, they punish you. It's typical government to call that "voluntary." (Garfield)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tea Party Express III: Vote Them Out!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:34:22 PM
The “Tea Parties” are trying hard to get rid of people like Harry Reid, who are working HARD to impose Barrack Hussein Obama’s socialist policies on us. One problem with this: there are any number of “Obama followers” waiting in the wings to take over this job when Harry gets voted out. We need to vote them ALL out at the same time, and install people in their jobs who will help us keep our liberty, and our ability to make our own decisions in all things. If Obama gets assassinated, next in line is Joe (Stupid) Biden. If HE then gets assassinated, next in line is Nancy (Pooper) Peelosi. Any one of these people are just as bad as Obama, and I’m sure some of them will be worse if he/she gets the unbridled power Obama has. We need to vote them all out of office and “hamstring” Obama in his efforts to “collectivize” this country and make himself into a dictator. (Tea Party Express III)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Splitting Conservatives

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, February 20, 2010 4:31:12 PM
The liberals are trying very hard to “drive a wedge” between Republicans and the “Tea Party” movement by intimating that the two should be, or are fighting amongst themselves by saying the “Tea Party” is an actual political party (a third party), which it is not (for the most part). The Republicans are not being fooled by this and are actually FUNDING the “Tea Party” in some areas. Does that sound like they are “enemies?” (One News Now)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (4) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blame It On Conservatives

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Friday, February 19, 2010 3:22:26 PM
Yesterday, as soon as I heard some of the things the damn fool that “targeted” an IRS building in Austin, TX with his airplane, I predicted the liberal media would attempt to blame it on “right-wingers.” I was right, and Chris Matthews didn’t waste any time doing it. Notice there was no effort to blame anything on “left-wingers” when a “rabidly” left-wing professor opened up on her fellow professors in a university meeting, even though it was a known fact that she was almost unpleasantly liberal to the extent even other liberals stayed away from her. (Philly 2 Philly)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »