About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Huffy Killers

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:50:52 PM
It really makes me mad when I hear people who think it’s right to MURDER the result of unprotected sex rather than use a simple form of birth control like a rubber. They get real huffy when they talk about conservative Ken Buck wanting to eliminate “common forms of abortion.” They have nothing else they can talk about against him, apparently. A “common form of abortion” is to use a forceps to suck out the infant’s brain after crushing its skull, while it is still (mostly) in the womb. They don’t like for us to describe this “surgical procedure” in “common use” to kill their infant child for THEIR convenience. I think people who think this way should themselves have been the subject of a “common form of abortion.” Yes, there are other reasons for an abortion, such as saving the life of the mother, for which an abortion may be the only answer. They talk about rape and incest, but neither of those is a good reason to kill the result.

There is always giving the child up for adoption. That solution doesn’t “still a beating heart.” And it gives the child at least a CHANCE at a life of his/her own. Meanwhile, giving birth is not any harder on the body than most abortions. They talk about a “woman’s right to choose” what’s done to her body. But what about that CHILD’S right to choose what’s done to his/her body? Nobody seems to be interested in that. As to controlling her own body—what if she wants to be a prostitute? The state certainly controls THAT use of a woman’s body. I think people who think it’s their right to murder their own child are EVIL. I probably even know a few, but that doesn’t change my opinion of parents murdering their children for their own convenience. (Gift of Life)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Petulant President Slams Fox News

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:47:25 PM
Presidents and vice-presidents in the past have had “hard words” for the news media in general after the media has slammed something they did. But never have I seen a president slam a PARTICULAR news source generally for telling the TRUTH about him and his actions. This president (Obama) is so thin-skinned and petulant he just can’t stand it ANY time a news source tells the TRUTH about his actions, ALL of which are against EVERYTHING the American people want. Only his “captive liberal media” will never say ANYTHING bad about him, his policies, or ANY of his “accomplices. They’ll even FIRE any of their on-air people who do. His latest slam came in a “Rolling Stone (a dependable liberal news source)” interview. “The golden age of an objective press was a pretty narrow span of time in our history,” Obama said in the Rolling Stone interview. He’s right, but not for the reasons he cites. The liberal media today is solidly in his pocket (except for Fox News and a few others), and that is shameful. He says Fox has "been wildly successful," as if that were a BAD thing. It's not. They're successful because people are tired of the old liberal song they get from the liberal media and Fox is a truthful alternative. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Thinking Muslims Hate Ground Zero Mosque

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:44:14 PM
Thinking non-extremist Muslims don’t think it is a good idea to put a Mosque just FEET from where 19 Muslims murdered 2700 Americans, some of them CHILDREN. I’m very surprised to see this, because for them to criticize the Muslim terrorists can mean DEATH. I agree that “not all Muslims are terrorists.” I also agree that today, “all terrorists are Muslims.” Unless they live in Ireland, of course. But it really doesn’t matter; ALL people who kill indiscriminately to make a political point ought to be shot on sight when they’re caught in the act.  All terrorists should be tried in a special court convened just for them, where they do not have the same rights as Americans. They don’t deserve them. I include non-Muslim terrorists in that, if you can find any. (MEMRI)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Need More of This

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 25, 2010 3:26:57 PM
In Denver last night, two guys tried to rob liquor stores. One ran out the door and got away when the man behind the counter produced his own gun and threatened the robber with it. Self defense without firing a shot. The other one didn’t run when confronted by the counterman’s own gun, and was shot. He’s in the hospital now, getting better. Probably at taxpayer’s expense, since he’s a prisoner. The other guy was caught later. More would-be robbers need to be confronted with guns. Maybe they’d go into another business. (9 News, Denver)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Not?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 25, 2010 3:24:21 PM
An eighty-year-old man took a couple of shots at two young men trying to steal his trailer, seriously wounding one. The cops let him plead guilty to attempted manslaughter after initially charging him with attempted first degree murder. They say “You can’t use deadly force in defense of property.” Why not? The criminals use deadly force to steal it! The man says he didn’t mean to hit anybody; he was trying to scare them off. Of course, that didn’t mean anything to the anti-gun politicians. He shot at the bad guys, so they ASSUME he was trying to kill them. I think people ought to be able to do what it takes to defend their lives AND property from criminals who would KILL them to steal it. Part of his punishment was to “give up his guns.” Telling the next criminal he will be unarmed, so go ahead and rob him! (9 News Denver)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sorry, People

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 23, 2010 3:04:44 PM

There were no posts yesterday because I was busy going all over town, trying to get my new car registered. I’ve been working on that for three months, now. I even had to get an extension on my temporary tag, it took so long. I finally got it done yesterday, but was too exhausted to even turn off my computer and the light right over it when I finally got home. The new car was made necessary by an idiot female turning left right in front of me, through two lanes of traffic (during rush hour), who let her go, while talking on her cell phone.. She hit me dead center, killing my car. And then her insurance tried to make ME liable. At least, she wasn’t texting. Thank God for small favors! There have been several days lately with no posts while I tried to get the car registered.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SSllooowwllyy They Work

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:54:15 PM
My sister sent me an e-mail she got from our nephew David showing a dog dropping a big brown one on a picture of Obama’s face. I told her there will come a time when taking such a picture, sending it to someone, or even LOOKING at it will get you a prison sentence because it is an insult to Barack Hussein Obama. .It's funny now, but won't be when it happens. These people COUNT on people not believing things they PLAN to do in the future until they come true. Ten years ago would you believe the federal government would be working to "nudge" people to stop eating french fries by forcing the sellers to make their customers ASK for them instead of offering them right up front with everything and replacing them with carrots? (What? You didn't know about this? Try watching Fox News, who tells both sides). This is the kind of thing they are DOING now. Yes, french fries all the time are not good for you. And they USE that. But that decision should be YOURS, as a thinking adult.

But to the elitists (liberals) you are too STUPID to make that decision. Only THEY are smart enough. so they fix it so you CAN'T make that decision, subtly, a little at a time (Don't believe that. huh?). Today they "nudge" you in the direction they want you to go, Tomorrow, they simply BAN french fries (Or whatever else they figure they can control). It's the small things they're doing now that will lead to laws allowing them to do BIG things later. And they're many. Too many to even keep track of, let alone list. There are people working day and night on this. And WE'RE paying for it. More and more every day. They do it in such small advances people who pay no attention to what they're doing don't even notice it. Even many who DO pay attention don't notice. But I see the patterns emerging. That doesn't make me smarter. I just pay attention; all the time. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time Magazine and "Islamphobic"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:48:30 PM
Time Magazine has “bought the bullsh-t” of the “imaginary, made-up word,” Islamaphobic.” The ”Christianophobes” made it up to intimate that ANYBODY who opposed that “slap in the face to Americans” Mosque they want to build within FEET of their biggest (accidental) triumph at the World Trade Center are somehow “irrationally afraid” of Muslims. Nobody is “irrationally afraid” of Muslims. We just think to build a Mosque in that location is an INSULT to all Americans, and, except for the stupidity of liberals, there should have never even been a discussion about it. Militant gays use the same tactic with their made-up word. “Homophobia.” Actually, there IS no such word until they made it up, in both cases. They’ll call me a “Muslim-hater” AND a “gay-hater for this item, but that’s their only defense. They cannot hope to beat me by arguing the issues truthfully. (Media Research Center
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Telling Us Who They Fear

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:44:46 PM
 The liberal “”ruling class” will always tell us who they fear by trying their best to ruin them. They’re doing it with Sarah Palin, whom they fear can, and WILL “tear them a new one” in the next presidential election. Meanwhile her candidates will win many congressional seats and, hopefully, emasculate Obama’s voting majority so it will be much harder for him and his accomplices to screw us out of our money and our rights. Rush Limbaugh causes them to wet their pant because he tells the truth, using their own words to pillory them. They fear Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, and Bill O’Reilly for the same reasons. Just listen to them. They’ll keep you informed on who they fear most of all. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This IS Communiom!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:05:22 PM
No argument about it, it IS. You might criticize me for saying it, but it IS. It is the DEFINITION of communism. Communism, Like socialism and fascism, is COLLECTIVISM; the act of TAKING from those who EARN and GIVING to those who DON’T! Without the government involved, this would rightly be called THIEVERY. But Obama’s “science czar” says “redistribution of wealth, in, and between countries, is ESSENTIAL.” Redistribution of wealth is COLLECTIVISM! It is WRONG! Honest people don’t take from those who earn and give that taken to those who don’t. I hate to have to keep saying this, but people just aren’t LISTENING while Obama’s friends dress it up in pretty-sounding words. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Exact Opposite

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:02:27 PM
"I am for doing good to the poor, but I differ in opinion of the means. I think the best way of doing good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or driving them out of it. In my youth I traveled much, and I observed in different countries, that the more public provisions were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer." (Benjamin Franklin) This lesson was learned by the Founders, but has been forgotten by today’s politicians, who concentrate on “making them “more comfortable in their poverty.” And thus they sink ever further into their poverty. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Owed Taxes Not A Bar to Employment

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:33:59 PM
Seems like every time the Obama administration hires or appoints somebody he/she owes some back taxes. Taxes most of them have yet to pay, and which NONE of them are ever punished for. Seems like ALL Democrats don't pay their taxes, but they expect us to. Which makes it funny that most of the objections to Christine O’Donnel, the “Tea Party” candidate who won in Delaware, is that she has HAD some tax problems in the past. O’Donnell is at the head of what is going to be as long list of Tea Party candidates who unseat both Democrats AND Republicans who have supported Obama’s cons. (Washington Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The "Republican" Tea Parties

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 18, 2010 6:29:14 PM
That’s what Vice President Joe Biden calls ALL “Tea Party” identified candidates. But, as usual, that’s a lie. True, most candidates identified with the Tea Parties ARE Republicans because nobody in his right mind would want to be identified with the Democrats. But they’re more “Tea Party” than Republican. They’re only Republican because there’s nothing else to be if you’re honest. They’re NOT “extreme candidates.” They’re “grass-roots Americans” who are tired of being looted by the likes of Obama and Joe “Biden. That makes them “extreme” to the “ruling class.” Joe thinks Democrats are going to retain their majority in Congress in November. He's in denial, like many "ruling class" Democrats. I hope Americans aren’t that stupid. If they are, they deserve the screwing they’re going to get. (Town Hall)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just Get the Hell Out of the Way!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:50:40 PM
The liberals want you to think they’re doing everything they can to repair the injured economy THEY messed up in order to get elected, but they’re not. They’re “meddling” in things they know nothing about and are making it worse. All they have to do to fix things is to get the hell out of the way and quit “hamstringing private enterprise” with their onerous regulations that are impossible to obey and raising the taxes on the very people who CAN make things better, “the rich.” They stupidly think they can raise enough money to “fix things” by doing so, when to do so destroys the INCENTIVE for the rich to invest in jobs-creating, profit-making (and thus new taxable income) projects, which will INCREASE the taxable income for which they must pay taxes. They can’t figure this out, and nobody seems able to convince them of it. Which is why they should NOT be in a position to make decisions on just WHOM to tax, and how much. Go ahead liberals. Prove me wrong. I DARE you. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Liberals Slant the News

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:39:35 PM
They’re “in denial.” They just can’t face the fact that the voters are going to hurt Democrats like never before in November BECAUSE they voted for Obama’s ripoff measures such as his health care swindle and the rest of his flights of fancy that spent more money than there IS in his first two years as president. They blame “voter anger,” and they’re right. But that “anger” has a very BASIC cause and it’s going to hit the Democrats on their “blind side.” They just can’t credit voter INTELLIGENCE for the “voter anger” they blame for their miseries. They say voters blame BUSH for the economic woes that were caused by DEMOCRATS to get elected. I defy ANYBODY to prove me wrong on that. Today’s voters are a lot smarter than the ones who elected this petulant little boy president in 2008, and are eager to correct that mistake in 2012. They can’t get rid of him until then, but they CAN emasculate him in the Congress by sending all his allies there home. The story linked below shows just how desperate they are. (Media Research Center)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »