It really makes me mad when I hear people who think it’s right to MURDER the result of unprotected sex rather than use a simple form of birth control like a rubber. They get real huffy when they talk about conservative Ken Buck wanting to eliminate “common forms of abortion.” They have nothing else they can talk about against him, apparently. A “common form of abortion” is to use a forceps to suck out the infant’s brain after crushing its skull, while it is still (mostly) in the womb. They don’t like for us to describe this “surgical procedure” in “common use” to kill their infant child for THEIR convenience. I think people who think this way should themselves have been the subject of a “common form of abortion.” Yes, there are other reasons for an abortion, such as saving the life of the mother, for which an abortion may be the only answer. They talk about rape and incest, but neither of those is a good reason to kill the result.
There is always giving the child up for adoption. That solution doesn’t “still a beating heart.” And it gives the child at least a CHANCE at a life of his/her own. Meanwhile, giving birth is not any harder on the body than most abortions. They talk about a “woman’s right to choose” what’s done to her body. But what about that CHILD’S right to choose what’s done to his/her body? Nobody seems to be interested in that. As to controlling her own body—what if she wants to be a prostitute? The state certainly controls THAT use of a woman’s body. I think people who think it’s their right to murder their own child are EVIL. I probably even know a few, but that doesn’t change my opinion of parents murdering their children for their own convenience. (Gift of Life