About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Obama Lies Again

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 16, 2010 2:36:39 PM
So what else is new? He says a “police station” being built in Columbus, Ohio, was funded by his Stimulus Package, passed in 2007. Only problem is, that project started in 2006, the year before. Yes, there IS “federal money” involved in the project, but NOT “stimulus money (it came from a congressional earmark).” Another lie is that it is a police station. It is not. It is a warehouse the city bought years ago and is refurbishing. Yes, “stimulus money” prevented the architect’s wife, who lost her job, from losing her insurance. But that isn’t the purpose of the stimulus program. Obama says Republicans are blocking the LOWERING of taxes for small business, but that’s a lie, too, If they’re blocking ANYTHING, which I doubt, since they are in the minority, it’s NOT a tax reduction for small business. He's merely DEFINING it as such. It’s probably a TEMPORARY reduction in a specific tax if they do what they’re ordered to do. That’s known as a “targeted tax reduction,” which is the only kind of tax reduction you’ll ever get out of Obama. (Columbus Dispatch)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Horrible Disease

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, September 15, 2010 3:05:03 PM
“Information about Ghonorrhea Lectim (Sorry about the misspelling. I had to do that to get around the censors.). The Center for Disease Control has issued a warning about a new virulent strain of this old disease. The disease is called Ghonorrhea Lectim. It's pronounced "Gonna re-elect 'em," and it is a terrible obamanation. The disease is contracted through dangerous and high risk behavior involving putting your cranium up your rectum. Many victims contracted it in 2008...but now most people, after having been infected for the past 1-2 years, are starting to realize how destructive this sickness is. It's sad because Ghonorrhea Lectim is easily cured with a new drug just coming on the market called Votemout.

You take the first dose in 2010 and the second dose in 2012 and simply don't engage in such behavior again; otherwise, it could become permanent and eventually wipe out all life as we know it. Several states are already on top of this, like Virginia and New Jersey, and apparently now Massachusetts, with many more seeing the writing on the wall.” This was sent to me by my nephew, David, by way of my sister, Patti. They send me many good things. My feeling is, if too many people succumb to this disease in 2010 and 2012, they will deserve what they get. I still see Obama ’08 bumper stickers and feel sorry for the people who are still ignorant enough not to have scraped them off. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Throwing It All Away

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:58:01 PM
Some Republicans just don’t seem to understand the power of the individual when they get together with the same ideas. The ideas of the “Tea Parties” are NOT extremist ideas, they’re very much “main stream.” Republicans have announced they will not support the “Tea Party” candidate who routed their hand-picked “old crowd.” candidate in Delaware, one of the most important places ever for them to win if they’re going to win, period. So they’re going to just GIVE the general election to the Democrats like a bunch of petulant babies—they think. But the “Tea Parties are a lot stronger than they’ll ever realize, until it “slaps them in the face” by “Tea Party” candidates winning the general election, as they did in the primaries. Sometimes the GOP just doesn’t know what’s good for it. The “Tea Party” helped them win with a lot of popular support in Delaware, and they want to throw it away by refusing to back the person who is now THEIR candidate in the general election. Are they just AFRAID of winning? (Update: word is, now the national party IS going to support her, after all. Maybe somebody woke up.) (Washington Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ignoring Democrats

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:49:58 PM
The media regularly identified the party affiliation of people they feel are doing a “good job,” but routinely IGNORE the party affiliation of those who are found with their hands in the “cookie jar.” Such as Maxine Waters, Democrat representative from California, whose husband profited handsomely from her being in Congress; or Democrat Charlie Rangel, who was “nonplussed” that a newsman would ask him a REAL question about his ignoring of his tax obligations, those he committed between WRITING the tax code for the rest of us. The party affiliation used to be REQUIRED on ALL signs and circulars for those running in an election. Since it became a “bad thing” to be a Democrat, candidates on BOTH SIDES leave that important piece of information off. Nobody can answer the question, “why?” (Ann Coulter)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Direction Only

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:37:49 PM
The Muslims whine about “religious tolerance” for us in America, but they don’t practice it in countries where they run things. They decry a small-time reverend’s wish to burn a Koran in response to the travesties Muslims have visited upon us (a publicity stunt that worked), but gleefully burn Bibles in return. They BAN Bibles, and ANY evidence of any religion but Islam where they run things and make LAWS against them. There are NO churches or synagogues in Muslim countries. They will not allow them. In some Islamic-run countries you can be ARRESTED and imprisoned, just for HAVING a Bible in your possession. Yet they still whine about “religious tolerance” when we rightly object to a Muslim Imam building a MONUMENT to the MURDERERS of THOUSANDS of Americans at the World Trade Center.

Should we observe “religious tolerance” that only goes in one direction? I don’t think so. I think Islam should have to EARN the tolerance they DEMAND, but do not offer. They SAY they have “religious tolerance,” and even write about it. But they don’t practice it in any way where they run things. The Koran says it is right to LIE to promote Islam, and that’s just what they do in claiming “religious tolerance” in Islamic countries. The article linked here talks about religious tolerance, but can you believe ANYTHING written by a Muslim when the Koran preaches that it is okay to LIE to promote Islam? (YaHind)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Quit Listening to Liberals!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 14, 2010 5:34:12 PM
Liberals get very “concerned” with the way we treat Islamic terrorists (seems to me a little OVERconcerned). Why? A bunch of Islamic terrorists just murdered TEN people who were only in Afghanistan to do good works. Normally, they would be unmolested, even by these ignorant murderers, but not this time. They CLAIM they’re “spies,” and “spreading Christianity.” That, from people who do not even allow a BIBLE where they run things. Where even POSESSION of a Bible is a death sentence. We need to quit listening to these liberal FOOLS and start treating Islamic terrorists like they treat us. That means kill them where they stand when they’re “caught in the act” of killing innocents. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Newsweek Lies About Sharpton

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, September 12, 2010 7:04:11 PM
Al Sharpton (“Reverend.” he calls himself, with no evidence he was not self-made) is one of the best known “race baiters” to come down the pike. He is a bigot himself, as witness his campaign against the Jews. Even worse than his old buddy, Jesse Jackson (who once called New York city "hymietown"), whose activities may not have caused the death of anybody (maybe), as Al’s have. They’ve shown clearly their perfidy with this article, that attempts to “whitewash” a man who has used race to enrich himself, not caring how many people he kills in the process. He has lied regularly to promote his ignorant rambles of racism that does not exist, to promote his scams to create the ILLUSION of racism in large companies, who them pay him off to leave them alone. This is the same scam used by Jesse Jackson and has been very successful for both. They have even been accepted in the highest government circles by people who don’t want them to accuse THEM of racism for leaving them out. You can’t accuse this writer of being racist, because he is also black and has not “bought” Al’s lies. (Larry Elder/Atlasphere)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Birthright" Review

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, September 12, 2010 6:59:52 PM
Congress is going to “review” the “birthright” concept that says a child born in the United States, even of illegal aliens, is a citizen. That’s wrong. It INVITES people to come here illegally so their CHILDREN will be citizens and they can create a “moral wrong” in deporting them. But what that means is Congress is “dragging its feet” on the measure and nothing will be done for years—as long as they can “stonewall” us on the subject by pointing out they are “studying” it. Personally, I think the parents should be required to be citizens themselves for that to operate. Of course, the left will call me a racist for that, But what the left thinks makes no difference to me. They just aren’t important. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A "Bitter, Xenophobic America"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:43:50 PM
That’s what liberal professors teach college kids who weren’t even born (mentally) when Islamic terrorists MURDERED 2,700 innocent Americans, many of them CHILDREN, at the World Trade Center in New York City. And just in time for the ninth anniversary, a stupid Muslim Imam announces plans to build an expensive Mosque literally on top of the graves of those innocent victims, to open on the TENTH anniversary of this abomination. And it’s “controversial.” How could such a thing even BE “controversial” if people in this country are intelligent? Apparently, enough of them are not, for it to BE “controversial.” Why somebody hasn’t shot this idiot down for even SUGGESTING it, I don’t know. Muslims have a habit of building Mosques on the sites of their greatest victories (even accidental ones). I predict that this one will not be built, and if it is, it won’t last a week. You just don’t taunt Americans like that. Yes, they have the right. But it is one of the STUPIDEST things I've ever seen proposed, and should NEVER be "controversial." There should BE no controversy among Americans about that. To be against it is NOT "xenophobic." It's common sense. Something many Americans apparently do not have. (Fox News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sorry for New York City

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, September 11, 2010 4:40:22 PM
I feel sorry for New York City because you have such a wimpy jerk as mayor in the current mayor, Michael Bloomberg, after having such a courageous man as Rudy Guiliani before him. He ran as a Republican, though he has governed as a liberal and should be a Democrat. How he could APPROVE of a Muslim Imam building a MOSQUE on the site of one of the buildings damaged by the Muslim terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, I can’t imagine. To APPROVE of such a thing after such a dastardly attack, no matter how legal, is beyond stupidity. there are many bureaucratic roadblocks that could be thrown in the way. Yes, this Imam has the RIGHT to build his Mosque. Should he? No. Not at this location. He should not have even THOUGHT about building a Muslim Mosque on the GRAVES of the 2,700 innocent people who died there. Muslims have a habit of building Mosques on the site of their victories, and this is just that (even if it was an accidental victory). This Imam should be imprisoned for even THINKING about building a Mosque on this site. Imprisoned for fomenting a riot, which will eventually ensue if he is allowed to continue with this abomination. This Mosque will never be built. Real New Yorkers will never allow it. And if it is built, it will not last a week before they destroy it. (New York Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Attacking Prosperity

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:34:25 PM
That’s Obama. Everything he does is an attack on prosperity. He has promised more and more “tax increases for the rich,” forgetting it is the rich who create ALL the jobs and profits he hopes to tax. He SAYS there will be no new taxes for those making under $250,000 a year, but there are. He talks about his “tax cuts for the middle class,” of which there ARE none. What he calls “tax cuts” are “TARGETED” tax breaks, meaning “if you follow my orders I’ll let you keep some of the money you earned.” He has promised to BANKRUPT the coal industry, one of the most necessary industries, period. Without coal, there is no electricity. Without electricity, there is no economy.. He keeps raising taxes, when anybody with a modicum of intelligence can tell you raising taxes in a recession will only make it worse. Everything he does is an attack on any prosperity we still have in spite of his policies. (Americans For Prosperity)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Worst Press Secretary Ever

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:31:41 PM
I guess it’s natural that the worst press secretary ever should accompany the worst president ever. Even if he is an honest man (doubtful, since he knows he’s telling lies daily), he isn’t being honest in his portrayal of what’s going on in the White House. It’s so obvious even the reporters who are on his side are complaining about it. It’s too bad this man is a successor to the late Tony snow, who was one of the BEST press secretaries ever. Gibbs is tearing down the reputation of the office every time he takes to the lectern. I can barely listen to him lie up there. (The Daily Caller)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

95-Year-Old Chews Obama's Butt

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:35:59 PM
This guy fought valiantly for this country, enlisting in 1938. He’s still “wrinkle-free” and mentally alert. And he hates what Obama has brought this country to in just a little less than two years. And he minces no words to say so in his letter to Obama (which Obama probably has never seen, since his “accomplices” tend to “protect him” from such “attacks.” But this guy makes some very telling points about Obama and his ways. Which is why Obama’s thugs will call this letter “an attack.” This guy had said many of the things we all want to say, but which many of us don’t know how to say. I don’t pass such things along in e-mails, but I’ll do the next best thing by publishing it here, as he requests. Thanks to Barry Cooper, who sent it to my sister, who sent it to me.(Letter to Obama/Snopes.com)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Now They Say It Was A Firecracker

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:32:46 PM
What? Why would ANYBODY want to kill Ahmadinijerk? How many Iranians has he killed for disagreeing with him? Will the next election be a 100% WIN for this dictator as Saddam’s last “fixed” election was after he did away with the 10% who voted against him in the previous election? Just like in the Soviet Union before the communist system collapsed (as all socialist dictator systems eventually will), they lie in the face of sure truth, trying to pretend their “leaders” aren’t hated and despised. They are, and if this attempt failed, the next one might not. We can only hope. Obama has the best assassination protection there is: VP Joe “Biden” and Nancy Peelosi right behind him in succession if he dies. Nobody would DARE kill him unless they could get all three in the same room. Mind you, I’m not saying it should happen, but I can dream, can’t I? (Huffington Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Many Times?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, September 05, 2010 4:15:48 PM
How many presidents have tried to “make peace” in the Middle East? Every one of them, in my memory, and I’m sure many more before my time. Each one has failed. The Muslims have been fighting the Jews (and other Muslims who don’t believe exactly the way they do) for THOUSANDS of years, and it’s unlikely ONE meeting, no matter how long it takes, will accomplish it. Several have gotten what they THOUGHT were agreements, but all of those have been violated, usually before the ink has dried on the agreement. Obama will not fare any better. I think it’s instructive that a central figure in the meetings is a WOMAN (Hillary Clinton), upon whom Muslims place much scorn, saying she should not be out without her male “keeper.” It is this kind of ignorance about Islam that has caused every previous attempt to fail (that, and the fact the Muslims only use such meetings to “buy time” to gain on the battlefield). (BBC)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »