About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Incompetence In Government

Socialism doesn’t work. But nobody thinks about that as the concoct their grandiose plans to “take care of us from cradle to grave.” Look at just ONE program: Medicare. The amount of “pay-in” is just about ONE-THIRD of the “payout.” That means Americans have paid in only about ONE-THIRD of the amount the government is paying out. And that’s just ONE program. What about Social Security itself? How abut the new medicine program that is so ill-designed that people who have no money wind up “in a donut hole” when they use up a certain amount of it. None of these “programs” will work, and they COULD have “run the numbers” when they started them. But they didn’t. They figured, “Americans will come up with the money.” They will not. They CAN not. This is the kind of incompetence we see continually in our government.

The same kind we have seen for years in Europe, where they’re now seeing RIOTS from people who have come to consider this kind of “largesse” as “their due.” They’re finding out in Europe that they just can’t afford to give so much of other people’s money away and are cutting back. Meanwhile our incompetent politicians are imitating that which has created so much trouble for them. Word is that Medicare itself will go broke by 2018. I could live that long! And lose my Medicare at the worst possible time in my life. I hope I don’t live that long. Some people say Social Security will go broke in 25 years. Others say that’s bullsh-t. That Congress planned for the “baby boomer” effect. The fact that they didn’t know anything about the “baby boomers doesn’t seem to matter to those with their “rose-colored glasses” on. (Washington Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Cave Has He Been Living In?

Ed Schultz thinks Obama’s had a much more successful first two years than did Ronald Reagan. In some ways, he’s right. Reagan didn’t have a “rubber stamp” Congress and had to fight for every advance. Obama had a majority in both houses fro the “get-go.” Of course, what Schultz calls “successful,” the “average American” would call disastrous. Reagan didn’t suffer nearly the drubbing at the polls that Obama did in 2010, and there’s a good reason for that. Everything Obama did was something the American people HATED. So now they’re working hard to first, get rid of his majority (which they did, in the House, while reducing it in the Senate), then get rid of HIM in 2012. I’d say they’ve made a good start. (News Busters)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialism A Destructive Force

Has it occurred to anyone that if you look back in the past, one of the greatest “Destructive forces” that ever was, is collectivism in one form or other? They always call it by different names, to fool you when it fails once again. Then they say, “Oh, that was communism, not collectivism!” But it WAS socialism that failed in Russia after 74 years of ruining the lives of many people. Witness the very NAME they used: “Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics.” Then there’s Cuba. One of the longest surviving socialist nations still with a socialist government that Fidel Castro himself says “Isn’t working for us.” But they’re a COMMUNIST government! Yes; communism is just ONE form of collectivism, otherwise known as SOCIALISM. Hugo Chavez, in Venezuela, is the undisputed dictator over a communist-run country. He is still in power only because the United States helped his country find and develop oil, which he “nationalized” (stole) later on.

In Argentina, Evita Peron pushed the idea that socialism was the way to go there. The only reason she didn’t serve as president longer is that she died. But she did manage to ruin what WAS a thriving capitalist economy by the changes that were put into practice in her name. Collectivism has many names. Among them are socialism, communism, Fascism, Progressivism, and others. Socialists are even now trying to impose progressivism on America, retaking the name after years of being simply “liberals” until people forgot what progressivism really was. The “Progressive plan” for America IS socialism. The Fascism in Italy during the second world war, AND the Nazism in Germany were BOTH forms of collectivism. Mussolini called it  “The National Fascist Party”, Hitler called it “National SOCIALISM.” Both were thinly disguised forms of collectivism. Collectivism ultimately DESTROYS any country in which it is used to govern. Russia is just one of the biggest and most recent failures of collectivism. They SAY they are no longer communists, but the SAME PEOPLE run things in Russia as did under the communist (collectivist) regime.

Their current president is the former head of the Soviet Secret Police and, while he tries to be less “strict” than his forebears in that office during the Soviet era, he is still an “authoritarian.” I could name many more examples, but I won’t because I don’t want to bore you. Suffice it to say that collectivism is at the bottom of every failure of a regime, under whatever name they call it to fool you. Died-in-the-wool collectivists excuse Russia’s failure by saying they “weren’t collectivist enough.” They say they “didn’t have PURE collectivism” there. That’s a crock. They had as pure a brand of collectivism as there was in Russia, and it failed because collectivism produces LITTLE. They depend on goods and money earned in a capitalist economy to have money to steal. They have to be “propped up” by other countries that still have some money left. Russia ran out of countries prosperous enough to prop them up at the same time they were in an “arms race” with the United States, and it was just too much. But the then Premier told their lawmaking body not to worry. “It is just a ‘back step’ designed to fool the American fools. It’s just a ‘cosmetic change.” And it is.

See a failure in the future and it will be evidence of the collectivist influence on that country. Collectivism is the “great killer” of governments, from within. Nikita Kruschev, a former Soviet Premier, once said, “America will drop like a ripe grape into our hands.” It didn’t happen in his lifetime, but it is very close to happening now, and the hands in which this “grape” falls will be collectivist hands if we allow it. We helped it along by electing Barack Obama president in 2008. He is moving us ever faster toward socialism every day, in every way he can. If you don’t believe that, look at what he has “accomplished” and listen to his WORDS. He wants to BANKRUPT the coal industry. He wants the oil business to die, He talks about an “even playing field” and of ways to “spread the wealth,” hoping you won't remember "the wealth" comes from the capitalist free market. All collectivist “key words.” I’m sure you can think of others. If we don’t get rid of this man, and of all those he appointed to be his “czars” we WILL soon be a socialist nation. Don’t let it happen. Check out Orwell's prophetic novel, "1984." (George Orwell)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

She's Got Her Blinders On

Barbara Streisand, otherwise known as "BS," says there is “no reason Republicans should have won seats in the last election.” This is just another indication of how IGNORANT she is. One of these days she’s going to find out how ignorant she is when Obama’s spending more money than there IS affects her pocketbook. Of course, she makes enough money right now she doesn’t notice. But she’s rich enough she’ll soon learn, as Obama’s money-stealers get to her. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Afghan Corruption

You’re wondering why it took ten years for the Afghan terrorists to “wear down” the Russians? Now it has been revealed that insidious corruption in Iran, running right up to Karzai himself, actually took much of the money WE sent there to help those the war has hurt and used it to fund the Taliban. Was not the same thing happening then? They stop short of saying Karzai himself is involved, but I think it is instructive to see that at least ONE “money man” who has been charged in the past, has had the charges against him dropped, by Karzai himself, several times. Why they always exclude Karzai from accusations of corruption, I don’t know. Maybe because he, like Obama in this country, CONTROLS the means of prosecution for those accused, and people are AFRAID to accuse him. But it is easy to figure that if this corruption is as widespread as it is, he probably is involved. And his action in dropping the charges against at least ONE man who WAS charged, several times, tells me a lot. No wonder we can’t seem to make a lot of progress in this war. We’re fighting the Afghan government, too, under the table. (Wall Street Journal)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Founding Fathers WikiLeakers?"

Not a chance. They realized the intelligence involved in keeping secrets. But then you have to consider the source of that crack. It was said by Michael Moore, who is well known for telling “tall tales” in the guise of truth. He has made a business of it, while making a FORTUNE for himself by doing it, and criticizing OTHER PEOPLE for being rich. He’s probably richer than most of the people he criticizes for being rich. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Governing By Regulation

A regulation means NOTHING unless it is backed by a LAW that was decided by the Congress. But Obama (and others) want to “govern by regulation,” making regulations to control things they are not allowed to control by law. That's how they intend to continue their agenda with a Republican Congress. They “enforce” those regulations as if they WERE backed by law and the victims must spend a lot of money fighting this in courts that are dominated by liberals who believe in the right of the government to regulate our lives, regardless of the existence or non-existence of actual LAWS that ALLOW them to make these regulations. Liberals all over the world do this, as this story will attest. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Do We Care What They Think?

WHY DO WE CARE WHAT THEY THINK? Many on the left have “gone ballistic” because Sarah Palin actually prays to God. Who cares? They don’t like ANYTHING religious, and anything Sarah Paln. They pick on everything she says, on any subject, whatever. She’s getting used to it, and often doesn’t even respond any more. I’m with her. Who cares what they say? We KNOW it’s going to be critical of her. So what? (Big Journalism)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hating the Military

What could be more STUPID than to hate the military, the very people who get between you and your enemies and PROTECT you? Yes, they carry guns. They kill people and break things. But that’s what they’re SUPPOSED to do to protect you from those who would KILL you, and break things that belong to you. Without these people to protect you, you’d be dead. Or living under a dictatorial regime if you’re lucky. Yet some shortsighted people hate them and all they stand for, not even considering that without them, they would perish. How people get so stupid I wouldn’t know except I do. They’re not properly EDUCATED. They go to school and, instead of teaching them real history, they teach them the “doctored” history they want them to know. They teach them the “politically correct” version of history that advances their agenda, which is to CONTROL them, and all they do. Some people say this is all about money. It is NOT; it is about POWER; the power to control the lives of all. The money isn’t important, except to pay for their agendas. They don’t need to OWN the money to enjoy all the perks of being rich. They just have to CONTROL how it is spent, and on what, or whom. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Leftists Want to Ban Water!

A group of students went to a “climate conference” (global warming crazies) and offered two things: Outlawing WATER under the “scientific-sounding name “Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO). Unfortunately, if they were successful, all life on Earth would end. They also offered one to destabilize the economy of the United States because they would not sign onto that “flight of fancy,” the Kyoto Treaty. It should be noted that the lefties attending HASTENED to sign both petitions, proving they will buy ANYTHING that sounds good, without examining the consequences. (The Lonely Conservative)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Merry Christmas Again!

You can’t say it often enough. I said it the other day, and now I say it again. “The PC Police” can take it and stick it. This day is dedicated to the birth of Jesus Christ, whether or not you believe in him. It’s the religion of Christians, and reference to it should NEVER “offend” anyone. I am not offended by reference to the symbols of other religions, and I should not be. And members of other religions should not be “offended” by references to someone else’s. Especially Muslims, whose “Holy Book” tells them to KILL anybody who does not believe exactly the same way they do. Today’s Christianity does not, even if they can find an obscure passage in the Old Testament that might be read in such a way that some people might think it does. In any case, it is not a “guiding principle” to Christians. Some non-Christians seem to think they can stop Christians from making reference to their religion by wishing people “Merry Christmas” on this day. They’re wrong, even if some liberal courts disagree. They misread the Constitution to say that government and religion should be separate. That’s wrong. There is NOTHING in the Constitution saying that. So I say again, “Merry Christmas to all!” No matter what your religion. This will be the only post today, as I will be spending time with my family. (Just common sense)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So What Else Is New?

They’re blasting Obama’s Surgeon General for publicizing a report that shows “just one puff” of smoke can kill you ” without being backed up by ANY science, whatever.” So what else is new? The “anti-smoking fanatics have been doing that for years! I still remember the billboard telling me that more than 400,000 people have died from smoking,” another conclusion on their part that was not backed by a shred of science, real or false. They just imagined a number and advertised it. Smoking may not be the best thing you ever did, but it’s not nearly the “death-dealer” they paint it to be. No matter how much they lie, people are still smoking. They’re getting desperate. So their lies become more and more outlandish. (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government Confiscates guns

Government troops went house-to-house in New Orleans after Katrina, on orders of the federal government, confiscating any guns found. Never mind the Constitution says we have the right to own and use guns in our own self-defense. One 84-year-old woman was thrown to the ground when she resisted this ILLEGAL confiscation of her personal property. Two days later thugs, alerted that she no longer had a gun, robbed her at gunpoint. You think this can’t happen in America? Think again; it HAS happened, and it WILL happen again. Watch this video. (USA Carry)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sharpton Calls Man "Punk Faggot"

Al Sharpton wasn’t always a “nice guy” (sic). In one case, while making a television show, he “lost it” and called an audience member a “punk faggot.” Sounds like a bigoted slur to me. I wonder if that audience member was white or black. In any case, that doesn’t sound like something what Al pretends to be today should say. Since he has now declared himself to be “Reverend Al,” he really ought to have better control of himself. (The Smoking Gun)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Catch and Release

More than 500 Taliban fighters have surrendered to Afghan government troops and have subsequently been released. What for? So they can go back and kill more of us? How STUPID is this? That’s like catching 500 MURDERERS, then turning them loose to kill again! Are we really THAT stupid? I know it’s Afghanistan, but we should have enough control to put a stop to this stupidity. If this kind of stupidity continues, we should simply pull out and let Karzai handle the Taliban himself. After he is then deposed and another Taliban government imposed, we can go back in and get rid of them again WITHOUT Karzai there to screw things up. (Washington Examiner)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1234Next »