About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Fear Mongering?

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, July 31, 2011 10:24:53 AM
The left likes to accuse the right of “fear mongering,” but what is this? “The left often accuses the GOP of fear mongering, so Nancy Pelosi's latest rant would seem to qualify as hypocrisy [so what else is new? -RT]. Pelosi skipped the pleasantries and told union workers that the GOP wants to 'destroy' everything, adding that they hate food safety [lie -RT], clean air and clean water [more lies -RT]. Man it's tough being a Republican - so much hatin' to do, so little time!” Tell me: what would the GOP gain from “destroying everything?” She has so little she CAN say about anything that she resorts to this kind of bullcrap. It is people like Peelosi who are the “fear mongers,” and they can’t deny it because they do it every day and anybody with any INTELLIGENCE at all can see it. One good example is Obama's "veiled threat" to withhold the Social Security checks when he knows the money is SUPPOSED to be in a "special fund" that is now empty because it has long since been stolen by previous and current politicians. (Glenn Beck)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cutting Defense Spending

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, July 31, 2011 10:20:27 AM
Liberals always want to cut national defense expenditures and other important things whose cutting will put you in danger or strongly effect you, not their entitlement programs. National defense doesn’t get them votes. Entitlements do. They don’t seem to understand we’re at war against a “roach-like” enemy we can’t “pin down” because they’re like roaches: they have no “central government, just a bunch of stupid people running around killing innocent people because they don’t believe the same way they do. We kill off their leaders, one after the other, and there’s always another gullible man waiting to take their place, until we kill him off, too. Then another one, and so on. Like roaches, you shine a light on them and they flee to a “dark place” where you can’t find them. When you stop looking, they come out again and kill more innocent, defenseless people. If we keep cutting defense spending, they’ll eventually overrun us and guess who will die first? The liberals, of course. They hate them worse than anybody else because liberals push ideas they don't like, like "normalizing" homosexuality. (Washington Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NYT Completely Ignorant

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:29:58 PM
“New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman: ‘[The Tea Party] is so lacking in any aspiration for American greatness, so dominated by the narrowest visions for our country and so ignorant of the fact that it was not tax cuts that made America great but our unique public-private partnerships across the generations. If sane Republicans do not stand up to this Hezbollah faction in their midst, the Tea Party will take the G.O.P. on a suicide mission’." Are these people hired to be stupid? It’s only COMMON SENSE to see that when you raise taxes, you LOWER the “tax take” because people take action to reduce the amount of taxes they owe. Look back on previous tax increases and see that each was followed by a REDUCTION in the "tax take." If you LOWER the level at which people are taxed, they do more things that create MORE taxable income. Again. look back on previous reductions in the tax base and see how much the "tax take" INCREASED. Thomas Freidman and the NYT are too stupid to know that. It doesn’t take an economics degree to see common sense. And since they have nothing REAL to say, they foolishly compare the Tea Party to Hezbolla. Show me how many rockets the Tea Party has shot into peaceful areas to kill innocent people. And don’t tell me it wasn’t Hezbolla that did that. Hamas are the same kind of people as those who did. There is NO comparison, but people like Friedman don’t know that. (Media Research Center)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An Excuse to Limit Your Rights

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, July 28, 2011 2:26:59 PM
Six months or more after the shooting that killed six people and almost killed Rep.Gabby Giffords, anti-gun freaks are still clamoring for “tougher gun safety laws.” But what ARE “tougher gun safety laws” that work? You can make as many new laws as you want, but those who are determined to shoot somebody will have no trouble getting a gun. Less trouble in areas where the “anti-gun laws” are toughest, because such laws CREATE a market for illicit guns. They just don’t seem to understand that CRIMINALS, who break the law for a LIVING, will NOT obey a law that says they cannot be armed. Thus, the only people these laws effect are honest people, which gives criminals an endless supply of unarmed victims. Even those “tougher gun laws” on the books are commonly used as “throw-away charges” to gain confessions and therefore aren’t of any effect in the way that was planned. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Marrying" A Child Is Okay

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:49:10 PM
At least it is, according to a Saudi Imam.”Dr. Salih bin Fawzan, a cleric in Saudi Arabia’s highest religious council, has reportedly issued a fatwa asserting that there is no minimum age for marriage and that girls can be married even if they are in the cradle.” That’s SO Muslim! Which is one reason why I think Islam is a phony religion, STARTED to absolve its “prophet” from "marrying"  his own nine-year-old “wife.” In the real world, there IS a MORAL “minimum age” for marriage, and it is at least the age of puberty, even if it is not written down anywhere. Old men don’t screw children. Marriage is no legalizing agency in normal human society. The idea of an old man having sex with a child makes me physically ill, and would do so for ANYBODY with any intelligence. This man obviously has NO intelligence. The picture with this story of all those men lined up with their baby “brides” sickens me. It sickens me even more that an entire society doesn’t think this is wrong just because a horny old man who happens to be an imam says so. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Michelle Has 26 "Servants"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 27, 2011 3:45:22 PM
What is different for Michelle Obama today? Why, all of a sudden, does she need 26 “servants?” She never needed them before. Yes, she’s the wife of the president of the United States. And she has taken on many responsibilities as a result of that. But does she NEED to? Most first ladies (except Hillary) stay in the background and just let their husbands do their jobs without interference. Why does she not do this? Does she have a “need for notoriety? And does this need require lots of “servants?” Or does she just like the idea of a black person “being served?” (They'll call me a racist for that) She said before the election, that “for the first time” she was “proud to be an American.” Why? Because America nominated a black man to run for president? IS he a “black man?” For my part, he is as much a white man as he is a black man. Why does he CHOOSE to emphasize his “blackness?” So he can accuse ALL of his detractors (and he has many, due to his incompetent performance as president) of being racist and not have to address the substance of his policies? I don’t say this out of racism, because I judge people as INDIVIDUALS. And these individuals act like two black people who can “lord it over everyone” and are determined to do so. Call me a racist if you want to, but if you do, it is YOU who are “buying their bullsh-t.” (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Man Spouts Hatred

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 5:20:32 PM
Then says only whites can hate: He says only white people can hate strongly, while he spouts the strongest racist hate I’ve ever seen. People like this are too stupid to realize how well they expose their own ignorance every time they open their mouths. He's a FOOL. He says Tea Party people hate Obama because he’s black. Where is his PROOF of this? Or is he just ASSUMING it because Obama IS black? Or half black, anyway. He says black people in the Tea Party are “sell-out blacks” who only want to “hang around” white people. That sounds like the old argument that black people who don’t believe the black racist line are “Uncle Toms.” It’s the same old line they’ve been spouting for years. He says “All the Tea Party is about is hating black people.” Where is his PROOF? I think all HE is about is hating WHITE people. Truth is, Obama is as much white as he is black. He CHOOSES to emphasize his “blackness” so he can make this claim. So what? This fool says “only whites can be racist,” which is one of the more stupid statements I’ve heard. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blaming Everybody But Herself

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, July 26, 2011 5:17:44 PM
Jane Fonda has just seen the results of her traitorous behavior and is now blaming “right-wing groups” for QVC’s cancellation of her show. She still thinks she can be a traitor and get people killed, with NO effect on her career, but she’s wrong. Her “day of reckoning” is coming, and it’s not the “right wing organizations” who are ruining her career, it’s Fonda herself. She just doesn’t understand that some people don’t appreciate her hateful and traitorous activities, and it shows in them staying away from whatever she’s in. I know I do. I haven’t seen Fonda in ANYTHING (but the news) since she showed up in that North Korean tank wearing a North Korean helmet, and gave notes slipped to her by American prisoners of war to the North Koreans so they could be punished. Some were beaten, and others killed. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Death Penalty Case

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:44:55 PM
If there ever was a “death penalty case,” the Ft. Hood murder case is it. An Army major went on base and killed twelve people who were disarmed by law while on base. Gun laws were obeyed by all but ONE PERSON: the shooter. How do “gun safety laws” that prevent honest people from being armed in self defense (against such people who do not obey the law) make us safer? Has there ever been a case where a mass shooter went into a gun show where everybody is armed and try (successfully) to shoot a bunch of people? A church in Colorado had ONE PERSON who was armed when a shooter came in to shoot a bunch of people. She shot him and he killed himself after killing only two people. If the principal at Columbine High School had been armed, he could have stopped the mass shooting in his school before 13 people were killed by putting a couple in the head of one of the shooters when he came upon him from behind while he was shooting people. But no, no guns are allowed in schools except in the hands of a uniformed (and easily ambushed and killed first) cop. They might as well put up a sign saying, "NO GUNS HERE, COME ON IN AND KILL US!" “Gun safety law” promoters have a systemic flaw in their thinking. They think CRIMINALS, who don’t obey laws, will obey a law that says they can’t be armed. I’ve said this many times, but nobody (who counts) listens. (ABC World News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Creeping Islam

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:41:42 PM
In England, a small group is trying to get the 15% Muslim population of a portion of England to first, voluntarily enforce Sharia Law and later to IMPOSE it on the populace. I think the government should take down their signs and make illegal ANY effort to enforce Sharia Law as an attempt to undermine the law of the land. Muslims do NOT have the right to enforce Sharia Law in areas where Muslims do not RULE, and they should be shut down when they try it. If this is allowed to happen, they can later use it as a precedent in imposing Sharia Law in other places. This must NOT be allowed to happen. One Imam recently said that "We would not have to impose Islam by force of arms. Muslims breed like locusts" and we can outnumber the opposition." You "peaceful Muslims" who want to kill me for saying that, notice it was one of your own Imams who said it. I only repeated his words. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Communism Is Alive and Well

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:57:01 PM
If you never watch another video, watch this one, and THINK. When the USSR collapsed, the world thought “communism is dead.” Nothing could be further from the truth. It has just “taken one step back” and is readying itself for two steps forward. That’s part of their long range plans. This video talks about the long range plans they proposed in 1958, and how they have realized almost all their plans since then—and nobody seems to have noticed, or care. One of their plans involved the environment—and anybody can tell you the “green movement” is one of the most powerful ones there is today. Obama is “putting the finishing touches” on communizing America, and he must be STOPPED! Thanks to  my sister Patti and Barry Cooper for this. (YouTube)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Surgically Implanted Bombs

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, July 23, 2011 3:54:22 PM
Whatever we do, the terrorist murderers find something to better fool us. Now they want to surgically implant bombs into gullible people to make suicide bombers out of them in such a way they hope we cannot detect the bombs. What that will do will only increase the humiliation we must suffer to get on an airplane, and soon on trains and busses, too, as they realize they can kill a lot of people that way without Homeland Security looking over their shoulders for a while, yet. (Ironic Surrealism)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

BBC to Silence Global Warming Skeptics

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, July 21, 2011 3:50:29 PM
I guess AlGore got to BBC executives. They’ve announced a policy to “shut up” global warming skeptics. They have decided, in their (government-run)  “wisdom,” that since global warming skeptics’ views “differ from mainline scientific opinion,” they will reduce airtime for their “minority” views. Who decided what constitutes “mainline scientific opinion?” Al Gore? That paragon of “scientific opinion” and truth? They complain about Rupert Murdoch trying to “manipulate the news” while at the same time doing it themselves, and even ANNOUNCING that they’re doing it. Seems funny that they have decided that global warming skeptics “do not constitute mainline scientific opinion” when there are more climate scientists (including Fred Singer, who invented the very instruments they must use to measure climate changes) who disagree with them than agree. I believe they’re just trying to “shut up the opposition” so they can maintain their lie and their swindle. After all, they've made billions from this swindle! (News Busters)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wimpy War

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, July 21, 2011 3:46:52 PM
When you go to war, you go to WIN. You don’t use half-measures. You commit everything you have toward winning that war. Clinton did not, when he went to war. So he lost. Bush did, so he was winning, when Obama and the liberal wusses took over. Obama is PRETENDING to continue the war while figuring out a way to get us out of both Iraq and Afghanistan. Meanwhile, he’s making “rules of war” that are getting American troops killed while making the Islamic terrorists very happy. In Libya he hasn’t even committed enough troops to get the job done, and so is getting LIBYAN rebels killed. If you’re going to go into a war, go in to WIN. Don’t do it in a wimpy fashion. Obama spent the years just prior to conning the nation into electing him blasting these wars and promising to END them—without winning. Which is stupid, but that’s what he’s doing. Now he’s withdrawing thousands of troops from Afghanistan, which is sacrificing many American soldiers, as well as Afghan citizens. You should never withdraw from a war until you either win it or lose it. We WERE winning it until Obama and the liberals undermined it. (London Telegraph)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Making Nothing Into Something

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, July 20, 2011 4:45:03 PM
“Rupert Murdoch says this is the most 'humble' day of his life and says he had no idea what was going on in the phone hacking scandal. Murdoch also pointed out that the News of the World was only 1% of News Corp's business - but that's not stopping the left from trying to link the scandal to Fox News. What doesn't help matters is all kinds of players in this story are resigning (even ones not being charged) and the guy who blew the whistle on the whole story turned up dead this week. Strange.” (Glenn Beck) Why is it so hard to understand that a man who employs 57,000 people might just be unaware of the actions of a few of them? Methinks the liberals are far too quick to try and link this to Fox, just because Fox is one of his properties. Does this mean the liberal media in general are responsible when one of the “Big 3” got caught falsifying an explosion to support an incorrect story they were running about auto safety? Notice how the writer of this article goes out of his way to "knock" Rupert's son. (Baltimore Sun)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »