About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

NY Times Shills for Obama (Again)

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, August 06, 2011 2:51:10 PM
They said losing our credit rating was going to be a disaster if we didn’t let them borrow more money. So we let them borrow more money and STILL lost our AAA credit rating. Now the NYT is “playing it down.” “Ever the dutiful Obama shills, the New York Times on Saturday downplayed the seriousness of the announcement by Standard and Poor's that it had downgraded America's debt rating to AA+. As you read this, imagine how this front page article would have differed if a Republican was in the White House.” It would have been heralded as “DOOM for the United States!” (News Busters)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Typical Liberal

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Saturday, August 06, 2011 2:48:16 PM
Bill Press, a not-so-well-known liberal talk show host on MSNBC (a cable network with few viewers) says Republican leader Bohner should be “struck by lightning.” He and many other liberals in media say things like this regularly, and nothing is done or said about it. But if someone like Glenn Beck said something like that the whining would never end. There’s a very definite “double standard” at work here, and MSNBC promotes it. That’s one reason why their viewership is shriveling. I have said this many times, but nobody seems to want to react to it. (Breitbart)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The REAL Sarah Palin

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, August 04, 2011 1:09:07 PM
If you’ve been reading all the crap in the liberal media about former Alaska governor Sarah Palin, you might think she is not qualified to be president. But if you look at her REAL past, you’ll see she’s UNIQUELY qualified to be president. Certainly a lot more qualified than the current occupant of the White House. Nobody frightens Sarah The reason why people in BOTH PARTIES go out of their way to slander her is they’re AFRAID of her. They know what she’s capable of, and they don’t want to have to deal with her in a position of power. The article posted below talks about what she did as governor of Alaska and is indicative of what she will do as president. It talks about Michelle’s “staff,” (in the last half, which is not carried by any media for fear of being called "racist") which costs the government more than SIX MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. No “first lady” before her ever had so many people devoted to helping her with her “social obligations.” Before Eisenhower, her HUSBAND paid for it. Hillary only had three assistants, and most others had only one. Michelle is a good example of a woman who is taking full advantage of her husband’s success. This in a world that is in the middle of a recession her husband can’t stop. Maybe he could use her as an example of how his administration “created jobs.” (Soda Head)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

al-Jazeera Carries Terrorist Water (Again)

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, August 04, 2011 1:05:44 PM
They ran an article comparing Glenn Beck to al-Qaida operative Anwar al-Awaki, with not a shred of EVIDENCE that it was true. But this is how al-Jazeera operates. It is the principle “mouthpiece” for Islamic terrorists the world over. They’ve apparently got Hillary Clinton convinced they’re a “trusted news source,” because she said so. This woman is WAY too gullible to be secretary of state. The problem with al-Jazeera is they think people all over the world are as ignorant as are the uneducated (on purpose) Muslims. Unfortunately for them, most people in the world are not nearly that ignorant. Hillary is apparently, but most people are not, and they just don’t buy the al-Jazeera lies. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US Gives Away Worthless Money

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:54:49 PM
America is broke. We HAVE no money to give away. But we still gave away $16 BILLION dollars in foreign aid. How do we DO that? The people we give this money to pretend it’s real too, and spend it as if it were real. Who finally loses when somebody realizes it’s “Monopoly money?” It’s just a big pyramid scheme and (as with all pyramid schemes) it’s the latest recipient of the money that loses in the final analysis. This government is being run by con men and being aided by more con men who put  the very systems in place they use to con us; like the “baseline budgeting” con. (Freedom's Phoenix)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How Some Cops See Legal Gun Owners

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:51:47 PM
“A police officer’s dash cam in Canton, OH caught a disturbing exchange last month between a cop and a driver during a traffic stop. In it, the cop can be heard (and seen) berating a man for not telling the officer immediately that he had a concealed carry permit and thus a concealed weapon, even saying that he should have killed him. But there’s just one problem: the man tried several times but the officer cut him off.” There are just some cops who should never be allowed to carry a badge and a gun. They see ANYBODY who carries a gun, even legally, as a threat. This is wrong, but you’ll never convince them of that. Other cops wish their bosses, the police politicians, would “see the light” that laws against honest people carrying guns don’t work, since criminals don’t obey laws. They wish more honest people would be allowed to carry guns for their own defense, since they know the cops can’t be everywhere to protect them all the time. Most cops are reasonable individuals, but cops like this should be fired. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Finally, An Agreement!

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:50:07 PM
At least, that’s what they want us to think. They’ve had this agreement right along, but went through the motions of an angry debate to make us THINK they’re going to have a disaster, but they knew all along they were going to “agree” at the last minute. that's how the swindle works. The sigh of relief given out by the millions of receivers of government checks (not me) could be heard in Berlin. But, since I pay attention to what they do, and I’m familiar with their methods, I was confident they would “come to an agreement” at the last minute, just in time to “avert a disaster.” And they did. They’ll do it again next time they want something out of us, just as they did during the “dog and pony show” they put on to pass that unconstitutional health care swindle law. You know, the one Nancy Peelosi told us we must “pass it to find out what’s in it.” (WSBT.com)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Same 'Ol Same 'Ol

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:45:36 PM
Obama’s veiled threat to not send out Social Security checks if he doesn’t get his way and get an increase in the debt limit is just more of the swindle they’ve been using on us for years and years; threatening to cut the most important and visible necessities if we reduce their ability to spend our money instead of reaching deep and cutting funding for their “flights of fancy” and welfare plans.. Like California threatening to cut police and fire services after we passed Prop. 13. This is their scam to whip up support for higher spending. They forget Social Security is SUPPOSED to have an “inviolate fund” to pay benefits to which they have agreed to pay for many years. By refusing to send out the checks, they’re ADMITTING that this fund no longer exist; that they’ve long since stolen the money. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »