About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Are YOU A Terrorist?

Seems all a cop or a fed has to do to take away ALL your rights is to “declare” you a terrorist and send you to Gitmo. There are no guidelines on just what constitutes a terrorist that they must follow. It’s a subjective thing and all up to the cop or fed who “deems” you a terrorist, and it’s almost impossible to get it reversed. So now they’ve started using it to silence their critics. It has become “terrorism” to be against higher taxes or oppressive regulation. They can arrest you without charges and send you to Gitmo or worse for an indeterminate time and there’s no appeal from this sentence. You won’t be “read your rights” because you won’t have any from the moment one bureaucrat or cop “deems” you to be a terrorist. They’ve somehow “forgotten” to create a system you can use to regain your rights. You will be lumped in with all those degenerate, Muslim extremist terrorists and your reputation and life will be ruined. You could even be subject to execution. For the moment, it’s only those against higher taxes and excessive regulation (like me). Soon the list will lengthen and there will be no public announcement. People will just begin to “disappear” and no one will know what happened to them. That’s when you’ll know we’re in a dictatorship. Obama is working hard to gain those ends, using Islamic terrorism as the “prop.” I expect to hear a knock on the door by men in black suits wearing dark sunglasses any time. If I disappear, I’ll either be dead or in Gitmo. (Update: they now claim people who pay cash for their morning coffee "could be" terrorists). If that's so, I must be a terrorist because I pay for just about everything with cash. (American Thinker/Rick Moran)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Covering Up Volt Fires

Did the government cover up the fires that happened to three Chevy Volts, right after a crash test, so the American people would still “invest” their money in a losing proposition? They’ve actually sold very few Volts, even though they’ve sunk a lot of money in subsidies for those ignorant enough to buy them. Were they afraid those people would show some spark of intelligence and not buy this government-supported disaster? I don’t know. But what I DO know is this is like most of Obama’s “green” issues. It’s a LOSER and Obama will not let it go until he is FORCED to do so. Obama has done more fool things in support of “green issues” than anybody I know of (outside of AlGore), and he scares the hell out of me. If he wins another election, I’ll question the intelligence of the American people. (Left Lane)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Technical Difficulties

Due to technical difficulties, we weren't able to post yesterday. Sorry.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"World Tax?"

The United Nations has wanted to be able to tax its members’ people for the longest time. Now they think they’ve figured out a way with their “World Tax to fund Social Services for the Poor.” They think they’re going to tax ME to help them pay for it, and they’re mistaken. I will not pay a PENNY toward a tax levied on me by the United Nations. The United Nations has no power to tax me or anybody else. They are not a nation; they are a “nation wannabe.” They can take their proposed tax and go to hell with it. I'd tell them where to stick it, but that wouldn't be nice. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abortion IS Murder!

I’ve said this over and over, and nobody seems to be listening; or they want to kill the result of unprotected sex instead of using a rubber and don’t want to take away their ability to do that by facing truth. But the fact remains that abortion IS murder. It KILLS a breathing human being, albeit while still in the womb. They can deny it all they wish, it's still murder. I just watched a television feature starring a beautiful woman who is an “abortion survivor.” Her mother tried hard to kill her, but wasn’t successful. She is now a mother herself; a mother of a beautiful little girl who would not exist if her own mother had been a successful murderer. I probably know many people who are abortion murderers themselves, but they don’t talk about it, and for good reason: they know it’s WRONG, even if it IS legal. It was made legal by some politicians and a few black-robed dictators. It was never judged so by any Congress—only by nine old men in black robes. My beliefs have nothing to do with religion. They have everything to do with common sense and logic.

People in favor of abortion SAY it involved a “woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body.” It doesn’t. It has to do with the RIGHT of that innocent baby to stay alive. If what women do with their own bodies is so important, why do we put prostitutes in jail? Maybe one day somebody will listen to me and do something about this “mass murder” of innocent children (53 MILLION so far). People who would not do anything to hurt a living baby favor KILLING them in the womb, for the parent’s CONVENIENCE. It’s as simple as that. Nothing more. Forget the polemics and rhetoric about “back alley abortions.” Yes, it isn’t pretty. But it can be prevented so simply by the use of a little piece of rubber or any number of other birth control methods that some people want to be banned. The simple argument is that fetus has a RIGHT to be alive. To kill it is WRONG, and that’s not a religious statement. It has the right to be alive, REGARDLESS of religion. If people like Bill Gates or Albert Einstein were aborted, the world would have missed out on a lot. If Adolph Hitler or Stalin, or Lenin had been aborted, the world would have been better off. But how would you know, at their birth or before, which they are? And who should have the power to decide? Personally, the only good I see from abortion is that people who kill their babies tend to be liberals, and what better way to reduce the number of liberals and socialists in the world? But I’m not willing to kill babies to accomplish it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »