About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Bush Never Stopped Working

Obama never stops vacationing. When Bush “took a vacation” and went home to his ranch, he could usually be found clearing brush, repairing fences, cleaning out barns, and doing other kinds of work necessary to maintain a ranch. He usually needs a minimal Secret Service presence because he’s usually DEEP in his ranch, working. When Obama “takes a vacation” he takes a VACATION and usually spends a LOT of OUR money doing it—even if he does pay for the hotel (for himself, at least, not the Secret Service—and I’m not even sure he does that) and other personal costs. When he goes ANYWHERE, he spends thousands of our dollars, just to get there, and more thousands or our dollars to be protected. When he “visits” a place, he disrupts everything because it must be CLOSED to everyone else while he’s there. Then there’s his wife’s myriad “vacations” under the same circumstances—and she seems to be “on vacation” all the time. Yes, the presidency is a hard job. But it’s not THAT hard as to require that many vacations; not to mention the hundreds of golf games he plays with Secret Service people looking on. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Incompetent "Leaders"

Why are we in so much economic trouble all over the world? Why is Greece in danger of going bankrupt? Why does America owe more money than there IS? Because our “leaders” haven’t a CLUE as to how to HANDLE our economy, but they “whittle away” at it, hoping something will stick. But it doesn’t, because they go at it all wrong. Obama thinks socialism is the answer, so he works hard to move us ever closer to socialism. Russia thought socialism (communism, just one type of collectivism or socialism) worked, and for 75 years it seemed like it WAS working, if you don’t count the Millions of people they had to MURDER to MAKE it work for that long—until it predictably failed, because socialism doesn’t CREATE new wealth, it merely FEEDS off of the earnings of producers to support non-producers. Cuba, one of the last, best-known communist (socialist) nations left, is fast failing and will soon find out how socialism DOESN’T work. The norm on the age of cars there is the FIFTIES, which is one piece of evidence they are in a decline. Nobody, not even the “richest” people in Cuba (except the Castros), can afford new cars. The auto makers don’t give Cuba a second glance because they know there’s no market there. All because so many “leaders” are incompetent and figure socialism is the way to go, even if the proof otherwise is so evident. They’re just not looking at the truth. They can’t HANDLE the truth. (Rick Moran/American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Hiding Many things

Beginning with his birth records. A recent inquiry in Hawaii resulted in a plain cover-up. It has become obvious Hawaii is HIDING his birth records to the extent of sending a Photoshopped version earlier, and lying to people asking now. His school records are “sealed,” and even FLIGHT RECORDS and other records that might include something about Obama are MISSING for the weeks of importance, specifically the week of his birth and other important periods in his life. What is he hiding besides evidence that he is an IMPOSTER president? Will ANYBODY have the guts to get to the bottom of it? Obama is a con artist who has conned his way into the presidency, stolen TRILLIONS of dollars he has given to his supporters through his "investments" into "green energy companies" who "took the money and ran with impunity" through bankruptcy. They cannot be touched because of the protection of bankruptcy laws. Obama is becoming more and more brazen in his cons and people are beginning to "wake up" to them. Hopefully in time to get him out of there soon enough. If not, what is now happening in Egypt may happen here. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

So What Else is New?

Obama is trying (again) to “rewrite history” by connecting what he considers to be his own “accomplishments” to those of previous presidents. In fact, changing history is an “official policy” of the Obama government; Michelle has said so in her speeches. Obama NEEDS to change history because he has nothing he can cite as his own that intelligent people will even CONSIDER an “accomplishment.” He needs a new “czar;” one in charge of “controlling history” and rewriting it, if necessary. And I have no doubt there WILL be one, though I don’t know what he will call him/her. (Conservative Byte)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rush Saved AM Radio and Cable News

When he started EIB there was ONE television cable news network: CNN. The “bastion of the liberal news media”. He didn’t TAKE anything from anybody else: EIB EXPANDED AM radio AND television cable news and created MANY jobs. Limbaugh has created more jobs than Obama and Romney combined. Yet because of liberal false criticism, he is still reviled in his own business, radio. Hillary and the National Organization for women are trying to get him taken off the air. They can’t give a real reason why he shouldn’t be on the air, so they make things up. They accuse him of “hate speech” without saying their definition of “hate speech” is telling the TRUTH about liberals. They call it “hate speech” but they can’t tell you what he has said that IS “hate speech.” (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

And Liberals Are Incensed

Conservatives don’t get honors. Mostly because most of the “honor societies” are run by liberals and they never even CONSIDER conservatives when they’re deciding which liberal to honor for one thing and another. One example is the Nobel Prize. One year they had to “consider” Rush Limbaugh because somebody nominated him. They couldn't stop it. But you can bet he didn’t win. AlGore won for his work on his global warming swindle in 2007, but Rush didn’t have a prayer in 2009 when he was nominated. Liberals were mad then, too. Just the fact of his nomination is an honor but later giving Obama one for what he “is going to do in the future,” not anything he HAS done tells me this award is worthless. As worthless as trophies given to sports participants just for “showing up.” Look at who they give these to and their liberal bias becomes all too visible. But they couldn’t control the people in Missouri who AWARDED the Missouri Hall of Fame trophy to Rush Limbaugh and liberals are incensed that a CONSERVATIVE had actually WON such an award. (Rush Limbaugh)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bain 80%, Obama O%

Obama has chosen to run against Romney’s former company, Bain Capital, whose job it is to buy failing companies and SAVE them. That means make them PROFITABLE! Something Obama and his henchmen just do not understand. Which is why it is not surprising that Obama has not managed to save a single company, nor create a single job, while Bain has saved 80% of the companies it has been asked to save. Obama is ignorant enough to disdain “profits,” which makes him completely incompetent as a “venture capitalist.” Of course, he thinks he’s great—and with YOUR money, while Romney used PRIVATE money. Venture capital companies DO NOT PROFIT by “forcing companies into bankruptcy” (as Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz has been heard to say). They only profit if those companies PROFIT. The very IDEA that you can “save” companies without making them profitable is STUPID and anybody who thinks so is incompetent—as is Obama. It’s no wonder their campaign against Bain and venture capitalists “blew up” in their faces. On Rush's page, linked here, there is a "partial"  list of Obama's venture capital failures, which is really a list of people Obama is paying back for their donations to his campaigns by giving them money they can "take and run" while being protected by the bankruptcy laws. (Rush Limbaugh)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sounds Like A Typical Liberal

One who hates her own mother and finds someone who LOVES her mother “insufferable.” One who can’t make a single sentence without “like,” “you know,” “somewhat,” “usually” thrown in the mix because she hasn’t a clue as to how to say what she means. This is a television personality who SHOULD know how to talk without all those unnecessary words thrown in. Someone who already hates Romney and everybody connected with him and is using her medium to “cut him down.” She said that “Stalin did it, Hitler did it.” So what if Stalin and Hitler may have loved their mothers? THAT makes Ann Romney “insufferable?” (Washington Times)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Cooking the Books"

Obama is at it again. He attributed ALL his 2009 spending to Bush’s last year budget, so he didn’t have to count it on his own spending list. Nancy Pelosi was the progenitor of this action, computing the budget based on rules that allowed him to do that and fool the American people into thinking he didn’t really spend as much money as he did. Actually, this is pretty standard in government accounting so as to minimize the American citizen’s knowledge of just how much money they HAVE spent. It’s “cooking the books” personified, and if WE did it, the IRS would put us in prison. But Obama gets away with it because he’s the boss, and controls the means of prosecution. The average American, when faced with figures such as this, “blanks out.” Their eyes glaze over and they just don’t understand the fiscal gobble-de-gook. the upshot is, they'll read this and say, "Uh, huh," then go wash the car and forget it. (USA Today)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Changing Tactics

The liberals worked very hard in the past to con us into using their plastic bags instead of the then in use paper bags in which to carry our groceries. Now that we have accepted their plastic bags because they DO seem to make it easier to carry things while being useful at home (not because they thought we should), They’re now trying to get us to stop using them. They’re not having much luck at that so now they’re changing tactics. They’re telling us we can get dangerous diseases by using them. What they don’t tell us is we can get the SAME DISEASES just by touching many different things in our “travels.” That we are making it impossible to kill those tiny microbes by overprotecting ourselves and allowing them to evolve so the sprays they sell us are no longer effective. I think we need to quit listening to these “nannies” who want to control what we do. (Update: they're now selling them for ten cents apiece that goes to the city. I guess if you can't stop us from using them, you might as well make a few million selling them.) (Fox News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Electing Socialists

France hopes to “fix” their economic problems by electing an avowed socialist to office, just as we did (only Obama was not an AVOWED socialist—he was, and is, still “in the closet” on that). But if you look at his rhetoric and the policies he has instituted, you can plainly see his socialistic tendencies. They think only a socialist can solve their economic problems, but it has been mostly socialist policies that have CREATED them, there, and here. Collectivism, (socialism, communism, Fascism, progressivism) FEEDS off of the productive. Without what is EARNED by the productive individuals, there’s nothing for the socialists to “share” with those who produce nothing. That is consummate THEFT to TAKE from earners and “share” (give) to non-earners. Both America and France need to get as far away from socialism as they can, and NOW. Only in that manner can we “solve” our economic problems CAUSED by socialists. (American Thinker)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Awards Himself Medal of Freedom

“KABUL (SAT 1 Re) - Unable to convince the Joint Chiefs of Staff to nominate him for the Medal of Honor for his actions of May 2, 2011 [The killing of Osama –RT], President Obama has decided to award himself the Presidential Medal of Freedom instead. During his address to the Global Community from Afghanistan  . . ., Supreme Commader-in-Chief Obama will have Afghan President Karzai hold the coveted award while he runs his head through the ribbon himself." This is typical of a would-be dictator. How many medals did Saddam award himself while he was in power? Seeing a dictator in an unearned military uniform with a chestful of unearned medals is so common it’s a cliché. (Unrepentant Patriots)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "Approved" Hate Speech

This pastor says we ought to put all gays behind a wire fence and not feed them until they all die out. Obama and his henchmen are quick to put the label “hate speech” or “racism” on ANYTHING that disagrees with him. But he and his thugs aren’t willing to call REAL hate speech what it is. He never disavowed the hate speech of “Rev.” Wright and probably won’t do so even with this hate-filled rambling. I really hate the way Democrats and their minions ignore the ramblings of people on their side, while damning anybody who so much as UTTER one of the “PC-banned” words. (KTLA.com)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They Now Know He's Lying

They say Obama has “lost his speaking mojo.” “Barack Obama’s oratory skills may have helped him win the White House in 2008, but his speaking prowess could be a liability in this year’s presidential election, says Sam Leith, author of Words Like Loaded Pistols: Rhetoric From Aristotle to Obama. Rhetoric is central to democracy, says Leith. ‘You win elections by talking to people, by trying to persuade them, not only on what you’re going to do, but that you’re trustworthy.’ And, he says, Obama talked his way into the Oval Office with ‘amazing speeches’ that invoked Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr., and he even beat out the presumptive Democratic nominee, Hillary Clinton. ‘He just spoke better than everybody else,’ says the former literary editor of the Daily Telegraph.” Obama has spent the last 3-1/2 years lying to them, and they are now beginning to realize it. So his “speaking mojo” has gone away. “Fool me once and it’s MY fault; fool me twice and it’s your FAULT.” (Conservative Byte)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why "Knock" Corporations?

Liberals and those who listen to their lies “knock” large corporation, as if they were responsible for all the ills in the world. On the contrary: they are the main source for JOBS and money for YOU. Your life would be a lot different if not for those corporations. You drive a car. A corporation built it. You live in a house and a large corporation made the materials for that. You make regular use of electricity, which is produced through the use of COAL, both of which are produced by corporations. You wear clothes, which large corporations made. You buy many things, all of which were made by large corporations. Corporations and “the rich” pay 86% of all income taxes paid. Without large corporations we would be living like they were in the 1800s. Do you want that? Liberals are “killing the goose that lays the golden eggs” and they’re not intelligent enough to know that. Are you? I hope so. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous123Next »