About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Accusing GOP of Their Own (Democrat) Tactics

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:43:54 PM
Nancy Peelosi, FORMER Speaker of the House (before we threw her out of that job by electing lots of Republicans), says that since Holder is “responsible for stopping vote cheating,” the effort to oust him is part of a Republican scheme to “suppress the vote.” Funny: isn’t that what the Democrats do in every election? Holder may be “responsible” to suppress vote stealing, but he doesn’t do it on the Democrat side, only on the Republican side. He even refuses to enforce the law if it involves "his people." He makes sure nobody knows about the Democrat vote stealing while making a “big thing” out of any on the Republican side. The effort to unseat him has nothing to do with this, but everything to do with his dishonest attempts to “stonewall” the Congress on his botched “Fast & Furious” scheme. This is but another dumb statement from the woman who told us we “needed to pass a bill to find out what’s in it.” (Rush Limbaugh)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ridiculing "Birthers"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Thursday, June 21, 2012 4:40:18 PM
Ridiculing ALL people who question his birthplace is Obama’s way of DEFLECTING any questions about it. When it started, I thought it was just another political ploy, this time on the Republican side, until I found out Obama was hiding ALL records of his earlier life and was even using a phony Social Security number, from Connecticut, a place he has never lived, and has never even been until AFTER his election. Then there’s his publisher SAYING he was “born in Kenya” in his book promotion literature (something he did not challenge for SEVENTEEN YEARS) Then I figured out that he has something to hide; maybe not his birthplace (although I still want to see proof of where he was really born), but something that, if known, might ruin him politically. The very fact of his avoidance of the question while ridiculing the questioners, tells me there’s something here. The question is not to be ridiculed. It is a LOGICAL question bearing on his very right to BE president; one that should have been asked before he was even ALLOWED to run. Why it wasn’t, I don’t know (maybe the fix was in). If he is NOT constitutionally allowed to BE president, that calls into question EVERYTHING he has done AS president. Every item to which he has affixed his signature DOES NOT EXIST, according to the Supreme Court, and that IS important, and NOT to be ridiculed by calling people names. (Mark Levin)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Hiding Behind Executive Privilege"

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:06:10 PM
 Those are the exact words used by Obama when Bush did it, so why is HE doing it now? What is this president, who promised the most “transparent” administration ever, hiding? WAS he “involved” in “Fast & Furious” as others have posited? I think he was up to his neck in it. I think the whole thing was HIS idea and he had a PERSONAL hand in planning and executing the plan. I don’t think this is a proper use of executive privilege in the first place. It was designed to allow his close advisers to make statements in meetings without worrying about the consequences if his words got out. This is not that. It is a “cover-up” of a deadly plan that resulted in the DEATH of a Border Patrol member. We should be able to see EVERY piece of paper relating to that, but we are being denied them in the biggest cover-up ever seen. I think Obama should be impeached over this, and run out of office. This is but one more evidence this president should NOT be president. (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disney to Refuse "Junk Food" Advertising

Posted by The New THOMA$ REPORT on Wednesday, June 20, 2012 5:00:46 PM
I guess they want to tell us what we can eat, as Michelle Obama does. They must be under really sharp pressure to give up TWO BILLION DOLLARS in advertising bucks while selling fried turkey legs at their various entertainment places. This ban has “ties to White House,” according to Fox News. I know if you’re a liberal you don’t put much confidence in Fox, as I don’t in CNN. But Fox has a LOT more viewers than CNN and CNN’s viewer list is shrinking every year while Fox’s is growing exponentially, which shows that the American people hate being lied to and will go where they can hear the truth. Of course, liberals hate that, and are (again) trying to get Fox’s “licenses” revoked. (Yahoo News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »