About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Raising the National Debt By Half

According to the Congressional budget Office (whose figures Obama cannot control), Obama’s stated policies will raise the national debt by ALMOST 50% BY 2022! They say taxes will rise by 30% in the next 2 YEARS! That means your grandchildren will be BORN in more debt than you had when you attained your majority. Obama has already spent more money than there IS, and if he is re-elected he will continue his prolific spending ways. It doesn’t seem to affect you because it’s DESIGNED to affect FUTURE GENERATIONS, and it will. This president is the worst enemy you can have, because you don’t think of him as an enemy while he undermines everything you do in his quest to make this country into a “socialist paradise.” (CNS News)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Ignores spending Limits

Have you wondered why, after all the hooraw over passing spending limit increases, you don’t hear about it any more, even if they didn’t pass the bill raising the debt limit? That’s because they just ignored it. “As House appropriators begin hearings on fiscal year (FY) 2013 spending, a second look at last week’s Congressional Budget Office report shows they already have exceeded their official Budget Control Act limits for the current year by a stunning $156 billion. Although some of this overrun reflects justifiable support for U.S. troops overseas, the rest results from loopholes built into the spending caps along with other gimmicks. The figures prove how urgent it is for Congress to shut down these enablers of profligate spending. But does anybody expect them to do so? Does anybody there have the “intestinal fortitude (guts)” to do so? I doubt it. (Heritage Foundation)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Stupid, Over and Over Again

You’d think Obama would learn, but he’s a Democrat and a socialist. He doesn’t learn from experience. He just goes out and does it all over again. After funding the first one (Solyndra) to the tune of $535 BILLION dollars and losing, then he goes out and funds yet another, and is now in the process of losing: “The company, Ener1, received a $118 million grant from DOE [Department of Energy] in 2010 as part of the president’s stimulus package,” writes the Heritage Foundation’s Lachlan Markay. “The money, which went to Ener1 subsidiary EnerDel, aimed to promote renewable energy storage battery technology for electrical grid use. Today, Ener1 announced it was filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy." Another hundred million down the drain, and I’ll bet it’s not the last. (Heritage Foundation)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Raping the Banks (Again)

Democrats raped banks and other financial institutions when they made that scurrilous law, the “Community Reinvestment Act of 1977” that FORCED lenders to loan money to everybody who asked, REGARDLESS of their ability to pay it back, an “exercise in financial madness that was GUARANTEED to create a massive financial crash from the moment it was passed into law, that Democrats could use to “take over the government’ without firing a shot.. They raped them again when they passed the “Dodd-Frank” bill into law (signed by Barack Obama) after Bill Clinton strengthened the original “Community Reinvestment Act.” And his AG, Janet Reno, threatened lending institutions with expensive, if futile, “investigations.” They blamed those victimized banks for the financial meltdown, accusing them of “predatory lending.” What? What is “predatory lending,” and who profits outside of the political party that wants to use it to gain more power? Dodd and Frank were at the forefront in the defense of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac the TWELVE TIMES George Bush and the Republicans tried to expose their scam before it was finally exposed and they were “shut down,” just in time to get many Democrats (including Obama) elected. Now Obama, still blaming the banks for what HE has created, is making even more laws to rape them again and again. I write this over and over, but nobody notices--or has the gonads to do anything about it. (Wikipedia)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's A Lie, As Usual

Scuttlebutt is that Newt Gingrich paid a $300,000 fine for ethics violations. As usual, that’s “twisting of the truth” lie by his opponents. I’m not a big Newt supporter, but I hate lies. The $300,000 he paid was NOT a “fine,” and in no way was an “admission of wrongdoing.” It had to do with legal fees; and the records support it. He did NOT “leave Congress in disgrace.” This is how politicians lie repeatedly in campaign ads, and is one reason why I never watch debates or put any faith at all in their “attack ads.” They’re almost always a twisting of the truth or an outright, blatant lie. I watch what politicians DO, and one of the things Gingrich DID was to sit on a couch on the beach with Nancy Peelosi to support that massive swindle called global warming; that’s NOT a lie. (News Max)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Racist--and Stupid

Samuel Jackson, black actor, says he voted for Barack Obama because he’s black. And he sounds like he’s still pretty well satisfied with him. He says “Obama’s message didn’t mean sh-t to me.” He just wished he would do some of the things he said he’d do. But nobody ever knew what he said he would do because he never went into specifics. He kept on spouting bullsh-t, speaking in generalities and slogans, saying nothing, and people bought it, hook, line, and sinker. What if I said I had voted for McCain because he was WHITE and his message meant nothing to me? Wouldn’t that be racist? You bet it would, but try and apply that standard to a black man in this day and age. Being black today seems to let you get away with a lot of things not available to white people. Of course, they’ll call me a racist for saying that, just to cover up their own racism. You can't get away with saying ANYTHING against a black person without being called a racist, Obama most of all because that's his con. (The Blaze/Ebony)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sikhs Have No Sense of Humor

Jay Leno showed a picture of a Sikh building in an effort to poke fun at Romney’s wealth (as any good liberal does) and brought down upon himself the wrath of Sikhs for “showing” that picture, even though it was only a joke. They don’t understand jokes because they are bereft of a sense of humor. One important Sikh said this: "Jay Leno is a comedian, take him with a pinch of salt,” he said. “But our politicians do not want to address real issues, like getting clean water to people. They would rather talk about silly issues.” Evidence that some Sikhs do have a sense of humor, or at least the ability to recognize it. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blaming Others

It infuriates me to see Obama going on and on, day after day, blaming others for what he and his gang of thugs have done, with that same gang of thugs standing behind him, looking on. Saying things like “Bankers need to right the wrongs they have created with their predatory lending practices.” But what CAUSED those “predatory lending practices?” And how could ANYBODY (except liberal politicians, from the backlash) profit from lending money to people who had no money and could not ever repay it? Yet a law made way back in 1977 by Democrats (The “Citizen’s Reinvestment Act”) FORCED lenders to make such loans WITHOUT delving into the credit history of these people. To do so was to invite an “investigation” that would cost them more than they lose by making such loans according to government “orders.” This is not “predatory lending (a contradiction in terms).” It is INSANITY and the Democrats knew it. They COUNTED on it, blaming it (falsely) on Republicans. They USED it to create a “bloodless coup” that allowed them to take over the government of the United States in 2008. It worked like a charm, letting them take over the presidency, the House, and the Senate. They STILL blame everything on George Bush and the Republicans. But thankfully, our constitutional system will allow us to correct this (if they don’t prostitute it with their “liquid document” bullsh-t concerning the Constitution). We need to vote every liberal Democrat out of office in November, 2012 while we still can. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"With or Without Congress!"

That’s what Obama is going to do. He has somehow LOST the notion that his job is not more important than is that of the Congress. He is not “the boss.” If Congress chooses not to go along with the stupid things he does, it’s not his place to “do it without Congress.” In fact, it is ILLEGAL for him to “do it without Congress.” What amazing EGO this fool has! He has never held an honest job; he has never met a payroll. Yet he has the temerity to think he can run everybody else’s life and all their businesses! Gad, what a FOOL he is! Notice the self-satisfied grin on his face in the story linked here. His ego knows no bounds. (Real Clear Politics)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are YOU A Terrorist?

Seems all a cop or a fed has to do to take away ALL your rights is to “declare” you a terrorist and send you to Gitmo. There are no guidelines on just what constitutes a terrorist that they must follow. It’s a subjective thing and all up to the cop or fed who “deems” you a terrorist, and it’s almost impossible to get it reversed. So now they’ve started using it to silence their critics. It has become “terrorism” to be against higher taxes or oppressive regulation. They can arrest you without charges and send you to Gitmo or worse for an indeterminate time and there’s no appeal from this sentence. You won’t be “read your rights” because you won’t have any from the moment one bureaucrat or cop “deems” you to be a terrorist. They’ve somehow “forgotten” to create a system you can use to regain your rights. You will be lumped in with all those degenerate, Muslim extremist terrorists and your reputation and life will be ruined. You could even be subject to execution. For the moment, it’s only those against higher taxes and excessive regulation (like me). Soon the list will lengthen and there will be no public announcement. People will just begin to “disappear” and no one will know what happened to them. That’s when you’ll know we’re in a dictatorship. Obama is working hard to gain those ends, using Islamic terrorism as the “prop.” I expect to hear a knock on the door by men in black suits wearing dark sunglasses any time. If I disappear, I’ll either be dead or in Gitmo. (Update: they now claim people who pay cash for their morning coffee "could be" terrorists). If that's so, I must be a terrorist because I pay for just about everything with cash. (American Thinker/Rick Moran)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Covering Up Volt Fires

Did the government cover up the fires that happened to three Chevy Volts, right after a crash test, so the American people would still “invest” their money in a losing proposition? They’ve actually sold very few Volts, even though they’ve sunk a lot of money in subsidies for those ignorant enough to buy them. Were they afraid those people would show some spark of intelligence and not buy this government-supported disaster? I don’t know. But what I DO know is this is like most of Obama’s “green” issues. It’s a LOSER and Obama will not let it go until he is FORCED to do so. Obama has done more fool things in support of “green issues” than anybody I know of (outside of AlGore), and he scares the hell out of me. If he wins another election, I’ll question the intelligence of the American people. (Left Lane)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Technical Difficulties

Due to technical difficulties, we weren't able to post yesterday. Sorry.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"World Tax?"

The United Nations has wanted to be able to tax its members’ people for the longest time. Now they think they’ve figured out a way with their “World Tax to fund Social Services for the Poor.” They think they’re going to tax ME to help them pay for it, and they’re mistaken. I will not pay a PENNY toward a tax levied on me by the United Nations. The United Nations has no power to tax me or anybody else. They are not a nation; they are a “nation wannabe.” They can take their proposed tax and go to hell with it. I'd tell them where to stick it, but that wouldn't be nice. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Abortion IS Murder!

I’ve said this over and over, and nobody seems to be listening; or they want to kill the result of unprotected sex instead of using a rubber and don’t want to take away their ability to do that by facing truth. But the fact remains that abortion IS murder. It KILLS a breathing human being, albeit while still in the womb. They can deny it all they wish, it's still murder. I just watched a television feature starring a beautiful woman who is an “abortion survivor.” Her mother tried hard to kill her, but wasn’t successful. She is now a mother herself; a mother of a beautiful little girl who would not exist if her own mother had been a successful murderer. I probably know many people who are abortion murderers themselves, but they don’t talk about it, and for good reason: they know it’s WRONG, even if it IS legal. It was made legal by some politicians and a few black-robed dictators. It was never judged so by any Congress—only by nine old men in black robes. My beliefs have nothing to do with religion. They have everything to do with common sense and logic.

People in favor of abortion SAY it involved a “woman’s right to choose what to do with her own body.” It doesn’t. It has to do with the RIGHT of that innocent baby to stay alive. If what women do with their own bodies is so important, why do we put prostitutes in jail? Maybe one day somebody will listen to me and do something about this “mass murder” of innocent children (53 MILLION so far). People who would not do anything to hurt a living baby favor KILLING them in the womb, for the parent’s CONVENIENCE. It’s as simple as that. Nothing more. Forget the polemics and rhetoric about “back alley abortions.” Yes, it isn’t pretty. But it can be prevented so simply by the use of a little piece of rubber or any number of other birth control methods that some people want to be banned. The simple argument is that fetus has a RIGHT to be alive. To kill it is WRONG, and that’s not a religious statement. It has the right to be alive, REGARDLESS of religion. If people like Bill Gates or Albert Einstein were aborted, the world would have missed out on a lot. If Adolph Hitler or Stalin, or Lenin had been aborted, the world would have been better off. But how would you know, at their birth or before, which they are? And who should have the power to decide? Personally, the only good I see from abortion is that people who kill their babies tend to be liberals, and what better way to reduce the number of liberals and socialists in the world? But I’m not willing to kill babies to accomplish it. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ginsberg is a Fool

She should no longer be allowed to interpret a Constitution she feels is “inferior.” Ruth Bader Ginsberg swore to “uphold the Constitution of the United States.” Advising other nations to look elsewhere for help in writing their own constitutions not to look at ours as it's "inferior" is NOT “upholding” OUR Constitution. She should be impeached for cause. She has violated her oath of office.That’s what we get when we let liberal OR conservative politicians appoint justices “for life.” If we find we’ve made a grave mistake, it’s all but impossible to correct that mistake. I think Supreme Court Justices should be appointed for a specific term, and replaced or continued at that time. Then they couldn’t do their damage for the rest of their lives with us able to do nothing about it. That’s why we get abominations like legalized murder of our unborn infants. (World Net Daily)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive