About Me

Name: The New THOMA$...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Killing You!

“King” Obama has asserted his opinion that he has the power to KILL you without any kind of trial, just on HIS opinion that you are a terrorist. He can decide, on nothing but his own opinion, that you are a terrorist and send a “drone” to find, and KILL you. This is the action of a man who thinks he is a DICTATOR, who is ALL-POWERFUL. He is NOT  There is NOTHING that would give him the right to kill Americans without a trial in our Constitution, which is the BASIS for the “law of the land,” even if Obama does deny it. He’s saying he could arbitrarily DECIDE you are a terrorist and send one of his drones out to KILL you—without any kind of trial. If you do nothing more than DISAGREE with him, he could do so. Or he could do it WITHOUT a reason, according to his opinion. Do you want to live in a country where your government could KILL you, at WILL? (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pis-ant Bast-rd's Pis-ed

Obama made yet another attempt to pass legislation that will do NOTHING to stop gun violence, but which WILL make it harder for reasonable, HONEST people to get the guns they need to defend themselves against CRIMINALS and crazies who don’t obey ANY laws. And he lost, after he told multiple LIES like the one about 85% of Americans FAVORING a universal  gun registration, which is a list of gun owners that can be used later (contrary to Obama's lie) to CONFISCATE guns when they’re “ready.”. They DO NOT favor it. Only in his TWISTED “studies” does it SEEM like they do. I’ve asked the same question for years of everybody I can think of including "anti-gun" politicians: “What makes ANYBODY think CRIMINALS and crazies will OBEY a law that says they can’t be armed when they don’t obey ANY other laws? NOBODY will give me a credible answer because they can’t without destroying their agenda.

The “anti-gun Nazis” just call me names and walk away, Other liberals just ignore the question and change the subject. Why do these FOOLS continue to bring out those old, tired laws they’ve had in their desk drawers for YEARS and try again and again to pass them, taking advantage of today’s calamities? Obama’s former chief of staff (now mayor of his home town, which has some of the tightest gun laws, combined with the WORST gun murder rate in the nation), once famously said, “Never let a good panic go to waste,” Obama and his “gang of thieves” never do. I don’t EVER expect to get an answer to my question because there IS no answer an honest man can give. Obama accuses the NRA of lying when they say gun registry will lead to gun confiscation. That is simply a DIFFERENCE OF OPINION, not a lie (to them ANY disagreement is a lie). Not like the MANY lies Obama told in his attempt to pass this useless legislation. (Washington Post/Jennifer Rubin)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Guns SAVE Lives

Don’t tell liberals, but guns SAVE lives. Oh, hell. Go ahead and tell them. They won’t believe you, anyway. They believe too much in THEIR truth. They still think guns kill people on their own, without the intervention of those eeeevil humans. They still think a CRIMINAL, who does not OBEY laws, will OBEY a law that says they cannot be armed. They still believe a CRAZY, who wants to shoot up a school or a shopping center will be deterred by the though of breaking a law from his plans to break MANY laws. What FOOLS they be! And no amount of logic will change their minds as they go about making more and more laws that keep guns out of the hands of RESPONSIBLE and law-abiding people, but which do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS. This illogic is lost on them. (Gun Owners of America)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When Is Obama Going to "Own UP?"

He has “stonewalled” us for a long time about “Fast and Furious,” where he approved selling guns to Mexican Cartels SUPPOSEDLY to “trace where they go” with NOTHING in or on them to find out where they go. Likewise with the “Benghazi incident,” where four diplomatic personnel DIED, including an ambassador. He has even given ORDERS to the survivors to “keep their mouths shut,” which they have. What is he HIDING? Is there ANYBODY in Washington or anywhere else with the GONADS to pursue the questions about these incidents, either one of which would have SUNK a Republican if they had done likewise? (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Women's Equal Rights(?)

I can’t figure our why MOST women put the toilet paper roll on “upside down” with the paper coming out of the bottom. What’s with that? Also, while they insist on “equal rights” with men (which is okay with me), they insist on the men who live with them “leaving the toilet seat down” for THEIR convenience, instead of UP, for the man’s convenience. Seems to me that’s not “equality,” but is “special privilege” for women. They are as capable of putting it down as a man is of putting it up and leaving it that way. Seems a little funny that they want “equal rights,” but in certain cases, they want “special privilege.” Is this right? I doubt it. I have no problem with equal rights for women. But at the same time, I resent their insisting on “special privileges” in certain situations. Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nothing Would Have Stopped Newtown

Politicians in Washington and in every state are running around like chickens with their heads cut off to pass SOME law so they can convince their constituents that they’re DOING something. But NONE; not a single lwa that ha been passed, or will be in the future (of the kind they're pushing), will do ANYTHING to stop such gun violence because they’re all aiming in the wrong direction. Instead of making laws to punish criminals who USE guns in the commission of a crime, their laws ALL punish people who have never done anything wrong by making it harder for them to have guns to protect themselves. This gives illegally armed criminals a steady stream of UNARMED victims. Violent criminals ALL want gun controls to get tighter because that reduces the number of possible armed potential victims while they get their guns ILLEGALLY. They break laws for a LIVING, so gun laws mean NOTHING to them except to make their crimes easier to commit without danger to themselves. Honest people should start buying their guns illegally, as criminals do, so they’ll be armed when the crooks come calling. (Just common sense)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Getting You to Quit

The “nanny state” can’t just BAN smoking (Why not? They ban everything else.), so they make it impossibly expensive. They’re working to do the same thing to guns, which they REALLY CAN’T ban. So they’re attaching a REQUIREMENT by “regulation” that gun owners have a MILLION DOLLAR insurance policy on that gun, which is so expensive most people can’t afford it. Hence, no gun. They say if you don’t buy it, you lose your “PRIVILEGE” to own a gun. (Conveniently forgetting that gun ownership is NOT a “privilege,” but a  RIGHT). Clever b-st-rds, these politicians. They make sure THEY have ALL the guns, so when they come to take our property they won’t meet a hail of bullets. (Tea Party)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blaming "Right-Wing Militants" in Boston Bombing

They have NO PROOF, nothing to back up their statements, but the liberal media still mentions “right-wing militants” in the same sentence as “Islamic terrorists” as if they were of the same stripe. Tell me: can ANYBODY show me some PROOF that right-wing ‘extremists” have done ANYTHING like this? I’m not talking about 100 years ago; I’m talking about NOW. If you have any such PROOF (doubtful), send it to me and I’ll publicize it. Not somebody’s OPINION based on NO evidence. Such will be ignored. PROVABLE evidence will not. . No sooner did I push “save” on this post than I see this in my e-mail. There has been not one, not two, buy MANY attempts by NAMED liberals in the media attempting to pin Boston on “the right.” Esquire’s Charles Pierce told people not to jump to the conclusion that Islamic terrorists might be at fault, but DO jump to the conclusion, without ANY kind of proof, that the RIGHT might be involved. Never mind the right has NEVER done anything like this. Even so, I can’t claim to have predicted this, because the left blaming the right for ANY such misfortune is so PREDICTABLE that NOBODY is surprised. (Tea Party News) Why do I cite a "Tea Party" source? Because you won't find something like this in the liberal media.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Did I "Jump to a Conclusion?"

I immediately suspected the Islamic terrorists when I heard about the Boston bombing. Was that not completely predictable? Should I have waited for more information before saying that? Check this out: al-Qaida put out a description of the kind of bomb that was used in Boston in their terrorist news magazine (that's right, their TERRORIST news magazine). Pressure cooker bombs were specifically described in that article. That is NOT a coincidence. Somebody read that article and used it as a “blueprint” for his bombs, Who subscribes to that magazine? Terrorists, of course. I certainly wouldn’t. This was in the Washington Examiner. Note also the article there about Chris Matthews trying to lay blame on the Right for Boston. (Washington Examiner)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Blackout For A Mass Murderer

Have you heard much of anything about the trial of a doctor who ROUTINELY murdered helpless infants who survived a botched abortion attempt? His trial has been going on for some time; did you know about it? Not if you rely for your news on the liberal media, which has “blacked out” the coverage of the trial. I asked a man the other day if he knew about the latest OUTRAGE perpetrated upon us by the White House (stealing your savings over $300,000), and he said he hadn’t. He said he doesn’t watch Fox News. He sure knew where to go for REAL news, but he PROUDLY said he never went there. That’s how it is for most of ignorant Americans and thus, they are IGNORANT of what their GOVERNMENT is doing to them and are smug about it. If they continue to do that, they’re going to bring the Soviet Union to America and they won’t even know it until it takes them over. (David Harsanyi/Human Events)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bad Guy Learns Lesson

The lesson is, not everybody is an ”easy target” for a home invasion. But the lesson is lost on this criminal; he’s dead. But it is a lesson other criminals can learn from: don’t break into this guy’s home and start beating him up. He’ll KILL you. This is a lesson that needs to be learned by more criminals, hopefully, for them, without them being killed. This criminal broke into a man’s home in Hickory, NC, and started beating the owner, one Paul Ohla, who had a gun and shot him. Ohla is a “senior citizen” and was slightly injured. But the intruder/ attacker is dead. More proof my contention that more guns in the hands of “goods guys” will either convince criminals to go into another line of work, or make them dead. The criminal’s family will probably say Ohla should have “warned” the criminal that he had a gun and would shoot him, which says it was HIS fault, not that of the criminal. Some things never change. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Little By Little, On ANY Excuse

The “powers that be” (so far, mostly in LIBERAL strongholds like New York) are using ANY excuse they can think of to confiscate (steal) as many guns as they can. They use the mental problems suffered by ex military (in wars THEY started) With NO evidence those problems caused them to become violent, to stop them from owning guns. In New York, they’re taking guns away from ANYBODY who is prescribed “anxiety medication.” What’s next? Anybody who is constipated? Anybody who has gotten mad at ANYBODY, any time in their lives? This is “the camel’s nose in the tent, people! If we don’t stop them, soon the camel will be IN the tent and you’ll be outside, shivering. Criminals will come for your property, bearing ILLEGAL guns (unless they're wearing badges), and you’ll have NO means of defense. Every law being passed today “to take guns off the street” takes them way from law-abiding people, not criminals, who don’t OBEY laws, leaving us defenseless. (Fellowship of the Minds)

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Sky IS Falling!

Because the voters in this country (a majority of whom seem to be ignorant MOOCHERS who want only to live at the expense of others, and elect FOOLS who will “keep the goodies coming” while our economy collapses from incompetent governing. And really ignorant people do things like “gun buyback programs” for not only REAL guns (which allows criminals to sell their broken guns to others and use the money to buy new guns that WORK on the black market), but also for TOY GUNS, which is about as STUPID as I can think of. Soon this country’s government is going to collapse from incompetent governing and we will sink into COLLECTIVISM, which is a STUPID system that has been DISCREDITED in practice, everywhere it has been tried. Most notably lately in Russia, where its socialist “Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics collapsed because there was no longer any INCENTIVE to produce anything, and everybody was just TAKING without producing. (Just common sense)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Really Believes It!

He really DOES think if we disarm ourselves, crazy, power-mad dictators like Kim Jong Un or Ahmadinijerk will say to themselves, “Self, if Obama is willing to cut his nukes, maybe we should do so, too.” Obama has shown his abysmal STUPIDITY by just MENTIONING such a thing. People like Kim and Ahmadinijerk are BULLIES. They don’t respect anybody’s “moral rights.” If we disarm ourselves, these CRIMINALS, like ALL criminals, will take advantage of our weakness and take what they want from us, killing us while they do it. I always thought he knew that disarming ourselves was NOT the way to self defense while he disarmed US to keep himself and his thugs safe.. But it has become obvious in his handling of the N. Korea-Iran situation, that he is not smart enough. (Patriot Post)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What FOOLS They Be (Again)

I think I’ve used that title before. But this story illustrates it better than anything else out there so far. I thought there was no limit at how STUPID liberals could be, and I was right. NOW A St. Louis pastor is sponsoring a “gun buyback program” . . .for children’s TOY GUNS! That’s right. You read it right—TOY GUNS! How STUPID is that? Buyback programs for real guns are stupid, but this takes the cake. This is an obvious attempt to BRAINWASH children against guns. It has no other purpose. Why do I automatically name them as liberals? Because only a liberal would be this stupid. As usual, they blame the gun, not the gunner. The true solution to gun violence is more guns in the hands of honest, reliable people. Then criminals would more often run into an ARMED person when they tried to victimize people. They would either change their way of living, or be dead and no longer a problem. Current gun laws do nothing but assure a criminal his intended victim will probably not be armed, and will be a defenseless victim. But don’t try and tell a liberal politician that, they’ll laugh at you and continue making their stupid laws to disarm the victims. I ran around "shooting" toy guns when I was a child, and I've never shot anybody with a real gun. Playing with toy guns does not pervert minds. The only perverted minds here are in the heads of people like this ignorant pastor. (The Blaze)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive